[Radiance-general] Skyvector from gensky vs. gendaylit

[Greg Ward]

Hi Achim,

This is impossible to debug without your long list of gendaylit options.  The genskyvec script should produce something for any valid sky input, so I suspect something is going wrong on the gendaylit side.

-Greg

> From: "Achim.geissler" <achim.geissler at intergga.ch>
> Subject: [Radiance-general] Skyvector from gensky vs. gendaylit
> Date: May 20, 2016 1:01:30 AM PDT
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> a probably small and stupid (on my part) issue. I am generating sky patch vectors via genskyvec –m 1 (e.g.). Input is either a sky generated by gensky 6 21 12 (e.g.) or gendaylit <lots of options>.
> 
> Now, my problem is that genskyvec produces different output for these sky definition options which is quite a nuisance when trying to postprocess the sky vectors. For gensky, the output is a triplet (r g b) on an individual line per patch, 146 lines in total. For gendaylit, however, the output is a single line!
> 
> Of course, I can reorganise the output, somehow. However, I would be interested what I am doing wrong, here.
> 
> Thanks for any ideas!
> 
> Best
> Achim