[Radiance-general] Groundhog Electric Lighting capabilities - validation challenge

[Germán Molina Larrain]

Hello everyone,

As some of you might have heard, it has been a while since I started
developing Groundhog (www.groundhogproject.org), an OpenSource SketchUp
extension for performing Radiance Simulations.

I am writing you because one of the latest additions to the LATEST VERSION
correspond to the capability of simulating Luminaires from IES files.
During this process, I had to reproduce the IES2RAD to respect the policies
of "if you only want to export, then you do not need Radiance" and "you
barely need post-processing before performing a simulation".

What is missing, now, is to compare the results of this simulations with
some obtained from other tools (i.e. Dialux, Relux, AGi32, etc). Since I do
not have any of those programs, or a WINDOWS machine and is hard for me to
find the time for performing these comparisons, I decided to ask for this
awesome community for help.

*Is there anyone who is willing to help me with this? I cannot really pay
you for it, but I can guarantee that you will get the require training and
support (remotely, probably).*

HERE IS A LINK TO SOME SAMPLE IMAGES
<https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0B2NfkTSl19hQYUNZOFliMHp2dXc&usp=sharing>

In any case, you are welcome to download and try and use Groundhog as mucha
as you want.

Best,

Germán Molina, www.IGD.cl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20160302/8e02076d/attachment.html>