[Radiance-general] RE : Light Shelf Reflections

Shamim Javed javeds2006 at gmail.com
Fri Mar 15 17:17:35 PDT 2013


Please see the following:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/e2kacbqnbvgw7dc/LS%20Reflection_15mar.pdf

I have tried to document my steps...  no success as yet.  Will keep
trying...

Shamim.



On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Andrew McNeil <amcneil at lbl.gov> wrote:

> Shaim,
> Can you try typing the commands I sent directly at the dos prompt?
> That would tell us if it is a problem with the outdated version of
> Radiance you are using or if it is a problem with the Ecotect Radiance
> Control Panel.  I still think it is a problem with the latter as the
> commands settings didn't get into the header created by Radiance.
>
> I'd rather determine if Ecotect related software is the cause now, rather
> than going further assuming that it is Radiance (which I doubt, but I am
> biased).
>
> Andy
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Randolph M. Fritz (i) <
> randolph+LD at panix.com> wrote:
>
>> 1998 is pretty old--it's possible we're giving you advice for newer
>> versions.
>>
>> NREL has a newer release of Radiance for Windows. I'm pretty sure you can
>> hook it up with Ecotect, but I'm not sure exactly how.  Anyone done this?
>>
>> Randolph
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2013-03-15 20:19:41 +0000, Shamim Javed said:
>>
>>  I looked at the files generated by Radiance via Ecotect and it looks
>>> like the version of Radiance it is using is 3.1.8.  Here is a copy of one
>>> of the files generated:
>>>
>>> "#?RADIANCE
>>> oconv mirror_scorrected_sky.rad mirror_scorrected.rad
>>> rpict -t 120 -vth -vp 9.628 4.564 6.510 -vd -1.701 0.360 -0.007 -vu 0 0
>>> 1 -vh 180 -vv 180 -vs 0 -vl 0 -dp 1024 -ar 45 -ms 0.17 -ds .3 -dt .1 -dc .5
>>> -dr 1 -sj .7 -st .1 -ab 4 -af RCP.amb -aa .2 -ad 400 -as 64 -av 0.01 0.01
>>> 0.01 -lr 6 -lw .002 -i -x 64 -y 64 -ps 1
>>> SOFTWARE= RADIANCE 3.1.8 lastmod Thu Sep 17 20:49:56 PDT 1998 by
>>> droberts on escher"
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Randolph M. Fritz (i) <
>>> randolph+LD at panix.com> wrote:
>>> On 2013-03-15 15:17:59 +0000, Shamim Javed said:
>>>
>>> I tried to replicate your simulation image (using Radiance via Ecotect)
>>> but without success so far.
>>>
>>> Where did you get your copy of Radiance? Do you know what version it is?
>>>
>>> If not, "getinfo foo.hdr" will identify the version of Radiance that
>>> generated foo.hdr.
>>>
>>> Randolph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Radiance-general mailing list
>>> Radiance-general at radiance-**online.org<Radiance-general at radiance-online.org>
>>> http://www.radiance-online.**org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-**general<http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general>
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Radiance-general mailing list
>>> Radiance-general at radiance-**online.org<Radiance-general at radiance-online.org>
>>> http://www.radiance-online.**org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-**general<http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Randolph M. Fritz
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Radiance-general mailing list
>> Radiance-general at radiance-**online.org<Radiance-general at radiance-online.org>
>> http://www.radiance-online.**org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-**general<http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20130315/be43191b/attachment.html>


More information about the Radiance-general mailing list