[Radiance-general] rad -n and -N parameters / switches

[Guglielmetti, Robert]

Amen, Giugi!! OSX was a game changer for me in terms of Radiance usability.


Rob Guglielmetti  IESNA, LEED AP
Commercial Buildings Research Group
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
1617 Cole Blvd MS:RSF202
Golden, CO 80401
T. 303.275.4319
F. 303.630.2055
E. robert.guglielmetti at nrel.gov





On 6/16/11 12:39 PM, "Giugi" <antonutto at yahoo.it> wrote:

>another option is vmware with a linux image.
>
>but my vote, preference, soul (and pocket) goes the Mac OS X way...
>I would not be using radiance without a mac.
>life is short and it is once, why suffering?
>
>G
>
>On 16 Jun 2011, at 19:05, Lars O. Grobe wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>> 
>>> If you want to use Radiance on multiple core's your best option is MAC
>>> OS or Unix/Linux (Ubuntu seems to be user friendly).
>> 
>> Sure, that is the preferred way. However, I would consider how much
>>rendering work you expect. If it justifies setting up a dedicated
>>machine - do it unix-like. If it is not that much rendering time, you
>>are still free to
>> 
>> a) wait and have rad sequentially render images using one core
>> 
>> b) split your renderings and manually start processes - as long as they
>>do not need to share data, you do not need locking
>> 
>> Cheers, Lars.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Radiance-general mailing list
>> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
>> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Radiance-general mailing list
>Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
>http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general