[Radiance-general] rad -n and -N parameters / switches

Giugi antonutto at yahoo.it
Thu Jun 16 11:39:02 PDT 2011


another option is vmware with a linux image.

but my vote, preference, soul (and pocket) goes the Mac OS X way...
I would not be using radiance without a mac. 
life is short and it is once, why suffering?

G

On 16 Jun 2011, at 19:05, Lars O. Grobe wrote:

> Hi!
> 
>> If you want to use Radiance on multiple core's your best option is MAC
>> OS or Unix/Linux (Ubuntu seems to be user friendly).
> 
> Sure, that is the preferred way. However, I would consider how much rendering work you expect. If it justifies setting up a dedicated machine - do it unix-like. If it is not that much rendering time, you are still free to
> 
> a) wait and have rad sequentially render images using one core
> 
> b) split your renderings and manually start processes - as long as they do not need to share data, you do not need locking
> 
> Cheers, Lars.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general




More information about the Radiance-general mailing list