[Radiance-general] 3 phase method

[Andy McNeil]

Dear 杉原慧 or pkh0128,  :)

I suspect that your first problem is caused by matrix headers, which are
new since the tutorial was written. The first 9 rows are likely the result
of rcalc processing the header in a way that was not meant to be processed.
I suggest either using getinfo to remove the header, or use rmtxop to
combine the matrices.

cat yourmatrix.mtx | getinfo - | rcalc -e '$1=$1;$2=$2;$3=$3''

If you are piping from rlam or something directly into rcalc just insert
the getinfo part (don't use cat).

For the second part of your question, yes the last three values are the
sensor orientation. It is difficult to suggest a fix since we don't know
anything about your problem. Please describe more about your model, your
commands, your result, and why you think the result is incorrect.

Best,
Andy



On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Greg Ward <gregoryjward at gmail.com> wrote:

> Welcome!
>
> As there are different versions of this tutorial floating around, we need
> to know the exact command sequence you used and what operating systems (OS
> X, Windows, Linux, etc.) you are using to answer your question.
>
> Also, it would be nice to know your name, as many of us do not read
> Japanese.
>
> Best,
> -Greg
>
> *From: *杉原慧 <pkh0128 at eis.hokudai.ac.jp>
>
> *Subject: *[Radiance-general] 3 phase method
>
> *Date: *November 14, 2015 9:07:53 AM HST
>
>
> Dear all
>
> I'm new in 3 phase method. I have some problems during the procedure in
> the manual.
> I already got the good result in Example 1 and Example 2. the we are
> trying our model generated by GIS data.
> the final result by "rcalc -e '$1=$1;$2=$2;$3=$3' is as follows
>
> 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 0 0
> 0 2015 3 0
> 0 2015 18 0
> 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 0 0
> 0.4684572 0.4684572 0.4684572 0
> 1.089234 1.089234 1.089234 0
> 1.797346 1.797346 1.797346 0
> 2.416459 2.416459 2.416459 0
> 0.231454 0.231454 0.231454 0
> 0.4810487 0.4810487 0.4810487 0
>
> the last 6 rows would be the result of calculation.
> Do you know what it means the former 9 rows. Or do we have any mistake
> during the procedure?
>
> Also, we use the following text as pts file. we believe the last three
> colums are the orientation of sensor.
> Is it OK? In the case of OK, Our above results have some error, because we
> have large window on the east side.
> Does someone knows what we should do?
>
> -3.2387 0.2699 1 0 0 -1
> -3.2387 0.2699 1 0 0 1
> -3.2387 0.2699 1 0 1 0
> -3.2387 0.2699 1 1 0 0
> -3.2387 0.2699 1 -1 0 0
> -3.2387 0.2699 1 0 -1 0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20151114/a8ed4e97/attachment.html>