[Radiance-general] Strange gendaylit behavior

[Rob Guglielmetti]

Hi Thomas,

THanks for your input as well! I have good news; in classic Radiance Community fashion, some cool shit has happened. 

Greg told Ian Ashdown about my plight, Ian emailed me directly to tell me he completely re-wrote gendaylit and validated it a couple years ago for one of his clients, and just today decided to open source it! I will try and test it out this weekend, and Ian will get a link to it soon on his website (www.helios32.com). 

Another fine example of the greatness of the people in this community, a fine bunch indeed. 

- Rob


On Oct 8, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Thomas Bleicher wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Rob Guglielmetti <rob.guglielmetti at gmail.com> wrote:
> I was fixing to just look at the source myself, as I assumed the answer lied in there. I will revise my script to address this. Thanks all!
> 
> Don't mess with The Source, Rob!
> 
> I get segfaults for both gendaylit and /usr/local/bin/gendaylit but I'm chronically behind a couple of versions these days.
> 
> I looked at one source file I have around here (v2.3 dated 2009/06/20) but didn't find anything that would explain a different behaviour depending on the script name. However, I found that
> 
> if (skybrightness<0.05) skybrightness=0.01;
> 
> a few times. So you probably can save a few 0s in your input if that helps you to produce the error message reliably.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20111008/d0fd1876/attachment.html>