[Radiance-general] Re: Thesys target

[Greg Ward]

Hi Lucio,

Related to your earlier post, I found the following message from Ian  
Ashdown (author of AGi32) while digging through my InBox:

> From: "Ian Ashdown" <ian_ashdown at helios32.com>
> Date: July 22, 2007 10:09:57 AM PDT
> To: "'Greg Ward'" <gregoryjward at gmail.com>
> Subject: CIE 171:2006 validation
>
> If you or any of your legion of experienced users ever feel  
> inclined to validate Radiance against CIE 171:2006, “Test cases to  
> assess the accuracy of lighting computer programs,” be sure to read  
> this document from Lighting Analysts’ Web site beforehand. There  
> are two test cases that are incorrectly formulated (confirmed by  
> David DiLaura), and a few errors in the reference data.
>
> - Ian
>
================

> From: "loscotec\@libero\.it" <loscotec at libero.it>
> Date: January 15, 2008 6:51:05 AM PST
>
> Thank you very much for your reply Axel..
>
> I did thought as well some cases were based on real measurement but  
> I did read too it quite fastly.
>
> According to Antonutto someone else already did that validation..   
> So, there's no need to repeat it (even if actually I'm not able to  
> find this research on the web).
>
> Anyway.. in an hour I will talk with my teacher to plan something..
>
> As about Relux I didn't look for report, 'couse I don't think it  
> could be interesting to me.. if you see it differently, please,  
> tell me why !
>
> Thank you again !!
>
> Lucio


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20080206/e1dd2907/attachment.htm