[Radiance-general] relation between area & rpict settings

[Greg Ward]

Hi Jelle,

What would be useful is a web link to some of your images, so we can  
see your model and the artifacts you are facing.

-Greg

> From: "Jelle Feringa / EZCT Architecture & Design Research"  
> <jelle.feringa at ezct.net>
> Date: June 8, 2005 7:28:34 AM PDT
> Hi all,
>
> I’m rendering out an animation with Radiance which basically is a  
> dissolving cube
>
> Thing is that it’s a bit pointless to use similar settings for a  
> Cornell-like box almost closed box, than a cube which is almost  
> completely open. So in order to get a more intelligent rpict  
> settings based on the open surface area  would be a good start. Now  
> my question would be whether possible rad (don’t think so) takes  
> this relation into account, or has anyone another suggestion of  
> doing so.
>
> Right now, I’m making a couple of rough intermediary tests, try to  
> come up with a couple of reasonable settings, and interpolate  
> through them, but it would be cool to do this in a more formal  
> manner, such that will be an advantage for later on since it could  
> be quite useful.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jelle.