[Radiance-general] Radiance Vs Viz
Peter Apian-Bennewitz
apian at pab-opto.de
Wed May 19 06:44:56 CEST 2004
Mark de la Fuente wrote:
> I've been having a discussion with the people at my office about the
> differences between Radiance and 3D Studio Viz & Lightscape. (They
> are used to using Lightscape and don't know anything about Radiance)
> And I was hoping some of you might have some comparison or contrasting
> comments on this subject since I'm sure most of you have had some
> experience with this sort of discussion.
Hi Mark,
there's a 2001 Lightscape/Radiance comparison at
http://www.pab-opto.de/ , although it would be worth redoing the calcs
with Radiance+photonmap, to show the differences clearly.
> Even though we are specifically talking about Radiance Vs Lightscape
> & Viz, I think this is in part more a comparison about radiosity Vs
> raytracing. From what I know, the big problem with radiosity is that
> it simplifies things and assumes lambertian reflections. This is
> obviously a deviation from reality, but I assume it's still possible
> to achieve a pretty accurate calculation of some sort depending on the
> situation. ...
Most materials show a specular peak at low incident angle. Interesting
materials for light redirection are non-lambertian, starting with
simple structures like outside louvers.
-Peter
--
pab-opto, Freiburg, Germany, http://www.pab-opto.de
[see web page to check digital email signature]
More information about the Radiance-general
mailing list