[Radiance-general] Re: physically-based landscapes

Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:02:28 +0900

Thank you very much for your reply. It is perfectly clear now. I was not
thinking that rtrace does a sampling calculation as well. As I mentioned, I
plan to take measurings of the sun separately anyway, so I will include it
in a different source (and not in the same picture as I had first thought) I
hope to get some results I can share with the group.
Thanks again and best regards,

Santiago.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Greg Ward" <[email protected]>
To: "Santiago Torres" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: physically-based landscapes

> Hi Santiago,
>
> Thanks for sending me your files.  It really does help to see the
> actual problem being worked on.
>
> The answer to your different values turns out to be quite simple, and
> it is related to the problem I mentioned with the sun being too small
> to capture with the default indirect parameters.  See my inline
> comments, below.
>
> -Greg
>