[Radiance-general] Faulty fisheye HDR, DGP always 1.0
Greg Ward
gregoryjward at gmail.com
Tue Feb 6 09:18:43 PST 2018
Hi Raghu,
We may need to wait to hear from Jan or someone who understands evalglare better than I do. I don't think there is a problem with your HDR image as you generated it.
-Greg
> From: raghuram kalyanam <kalyanam at rhrk.uni-kl.de>
> Date: February 6, 2018 9:05:41 AM PST
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> I added these options while passing to evalglare like below.
>
> evalglare -vta -vh 180 -vv 180 <hdr file>, and it worked but it always gives 1.0 as DGP (even other parameters are out of bounds).
>
> With out those options evalglare throws an error.
>
> Apart from that
>
> Are all the LDR’s provided, valid to combine into HDR?
>
> I doubt if one or more of the LDR’s is the culprit (especially something to do with over or under exposure).
>
> Best Regards,
> Raghu
>
>> On Feb 6, 2018, at 5:05 PM, Greg Ward <gregoryjward at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Raghu,
>>
>> It looks like your HDR image header is missing the necessary view information. Typically, this might be something like:
>>
>> VIEW= -vta -vh 180 -vv 180
>>
>> for a perspective such as yours. You should be sure that your fisheye mapping corresponds to one of the standard Radiance types.
>>
>> Best,
>> -Greg
>>
>>> From: raghuram kalyanam <kalyanam at rhrk.uni-kl.de>
>>> Date: February 6, 2018 5:21:59 AM PST
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I am trying to asses visual discomfort using fisheye HDR images. We generated HDR image from a set of 360 degree LDRs and then converted to fisheye HDR ( using a custom made tools). The intension was to use these Fisheye HDRs as input to Evalglare and get DGP value. The Camera used is Ricoh Theta V 360 degree camera.
>>>
>>> The problem I am facing is, the DGP calculated from the generated fisheye HDR with Evalglare is always 1.0. We did the calibration but I would like to have expert opinion from you people, what is going wrong with these set of images. Here is the link to the pictures.
>>>
>>> It would be great if anyone could identify the issue.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Raghu
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20180206/fa20e14c/attachment.html>
More information about the Radiance-general
mailing list