[Radiance-general] Lo-o-o-ng evalglare times

[Jan Wienold]

Hi Randolph,

it's hard to tell without additional information -  calculation time 
depends on so many factors, mainly on the amount of glare pixels found 
AND on the parameters you are submitting to evalglare.
But 15min is VERY unusual with this size of the image.
run it with the -d option and write also a checkfile with -c . Please 
post then the full header of the checkfile (output of getinfo, please 
keep all characters of including all tabs and spaces) and the output you 
get on standard output.

Do you create the image with a proxy geometry?

Jan


On 10/04/16 02:00, Randolph M. Fritz wrote:
> I'm running evalglare on some 1000x1000 5-phase method output files, 
> and getting runtimes in the 15+ minute neighborhood. Is this 
> plausible? Or is there something serious wrong here?
>
> -- 
> Randolph M. Fritz || rmfritz3 at gmail.com <mailto:rmfritz3 at gmail.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general


-- 
Dr.-Ing.  Jan Wienold
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
EPFL ENAC IA LIPID

http://people.epfl.ch/jan.wienold
LE 1 111 (Office)
Phone    +41 21 69 30849

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20160410/613af0c1/attachment.html>