[Radiance-general] SSD vs. rcontrib

[Randolph M. Fritz]

Thanks! BTW, Other World Computing is now MacSales.com.

-- 
Randolph M. Fritz || rmfritz3 at gmail.com

On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Greg Ward <gregoryjward at gmail.com> wrote:

> Generally speaking, SSDs should last longer in normal use than a regular
> hard drive, even with lots of write operations.  The wear-leveling
> management has gotten a lot more sophisticated since their first
> introduction.  Personally, I like the OWC drives the best.  That's what
> I've been using for some years, now.
>
> Cheers,
> -Greg
>
> *From: *"Randolph M. Fritz" <rmfritz3 at gmail.com>
>
> *Subject: *[Radiance-general] SSD vs. rcontrib
>
> *Date: *December 16, 2015 7:00:16 PM PST
>
>
> I think I'm going to get another disk drive for my Windows workstation, so
> I have enough space to run Linux on the machine. What do people think of
> solid state drives for Radiance runs. I am thinking that they might have
> wear problems, especially for programs like *rcontrib**.* Anyone have any
> experience this this?
> --
> Randolph M. Fritz, Lighting Design and Simulation
> +1 206 659-8617 || rmfritz3 at gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20151217/b2a192ae/attachment.html>