[Radiance-general] Reg. evaluating Radiance results

[Tim Perry]

Dear Vaib,

You should look at John Mardaljevic's Ph.D. thesis.
http://www.iesd.dmu.ac.uk/~jm/doku.php?id=resources:thesis

I hope that helps,
Tim

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Vaib <vaibhavjain.co at gmail.com> wrote:

> Happy Monday everyone, Dr. Greg,
>
> In a few days I will be evaluating my Radiance model with measurement
> data (illuminance values). Can you please recommend some
> guidelines/best-practices/research-papers that have conducted
> such quantitative analysis, and came out with some methodologies for model
> calibration, and their confidence intervals. My university had "Rendering
> with Radiance", that could have been a good starter, but somehow it has
> mysteriously gone missing. It has become a rare book, if I guess right. :)
>
> My experiment will be a controlled one, in which only the lights will be
> turned On or Off and I will check their influence on results. The major
> factor for anomalies could be from Sky, as initially I will be using Gensky
> as the sky model.
>
> I look forward for your suggestions. Thank you!
>
> Best regards,
> Vaib
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20140203/85f54078/attachment.html>