[Radiance-general] 3pm to calculate indoor solar transmission

Sat Nov 23 15:03:53 PST 2013

I think I can add something else that S. Vidanovic told me:

"Well, main limitation is that integration is not really done patch by
patch (at least not for solar part)...  If you for example take a look at
equation 280 you will notice that integration is averaged over sky and
ground elements.  In solar calculations, I do not care from which part of
the sky radiation is coming, I simply do averaging over entire sky and just
apply that into equations.  I have no idea how much error that will
introduce into calculations.  One important note is that I do care what is
current sun position and therefore I do know what is incoming patch at
given time, and will know really precisely to calculate absorbed solar
radiation on interior sides."

meaning that only the beam radation is passed thorugh the BSDF, and the
rest is averaged.
Also, EnergyPlus should add the absorbed and reemited radiation...? are you
considering that?

I am not sure about what EnergyPlus does about the Basis issue that Greg
mentioned...

German

2013/11/23 Greg Ward <gregoryjward at gmail.com>

> Hi Bruno,
>
> The underprediction is expected for fenestration systems with any
> concentrated through component, as the Klems matrix representation will
> spread out any transmission to the resolution of its patch sizes, which is
> around 15 degrees or so (square).  In other words, the direct component
> will be spread out by the resolution of the Klems BTDF.  I don't know
> whether or not EnergyPlus is using the Klems BTDF, and if it does, it might
> use it differently so there isn't this spreading of irradiation, but that's
> a trade-off between different types of errors.  Radiance spreads the light
> based on BTDF angular accuracy, but the integrated value (and therefore the
> subsequent interreflections) will carry the correct amount of energy.  A
> different energy sampling approach might dump the energy into a smaller
> area with higher concentration, just not get it in the right place.  It's
> difficult to say which approach is better.
>
> Cheers,
> -Greg
>
> > From: Bruno Bueno <bruno.bueno at ise.fraunhofer.de>
> > Date: November 20, 2013 7:16:41 AM PST
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm using the three-phase method to calculate indoor illuminance, and it
> works fine. However, when I use it to calculate total solar transmission
> (irradiance) in a room, I get an underprediction of around 30% (compared to
> other methods such as EnergyPlus). Can anybody tell me what I'm doing wrong?
> >
> > - I have an office with three south-oriented windows. Each window has
> only double-pane glazing.
> > - I use the -O 1 option in gendaylit to get radiance integrated over the
> solar range.
> > - I use the solar properties of my fenestration system instead of the
> visible ones to calculate BSDF data.
> > - I calculate solar transmission by creating two grids of sensors 1mm
> away from the windows (1000 sensors for 4 m2 window area), one facing to
> the windows (front) and another one in the opposite direction (back). The
> total solar transmission in [W] is the irradiance of the "front" sensors
> minus the irradiance of the "back" sensors multiplied by the window area.
> >
> > The three-phase method matrices are calculated as:
> >
> > Sky vector
> > gendaylit %i %i %1.1f -a %f -o %f -m %f -W %f %f -O 1 -w -l %i
> |genskyvec -m 4 -c 1 1 1 > daylight/tempSol.skv (%* are replaced by actual
> numbers)
> >
> > View matrix
> > rcontrib -f klems_int.cal -bn Nkbins -fo -o daylight/irrSurfFront_%s.vmx
> -b kbinS -m window_south -I+ -ab 12 -ad 50000 -lw 2e-5 daylight/vmx.oct <
> daylight/intSurfFrontSensor.pts
> >
> > Daylight matrix
> > genklemsamp -vd 0 -1 0 daylight/SouthWindow.rad | rcontrib -c 1000 -e
> MF:4 -f reinhart.cal -b rbin -bn Nrbins -m sky_glow daylight/dmx.oct >
> daylight/south.dmx
> >
> > Then, for the "front" grid, I'd just multiply the matrices as:
> >
> > rlam '!dctimestep daylight/irrWinFront_window_south.vmx
> daylight/tmxs%i.xml daylight/south.dmx daylight/tempSol.skv' | rcalc -e
> '$1=($1+$4+$7+$10+$13)*0.333+($2+$5+$8+$11+$14)*0.333+($3+$6+$9+$12+$15)*0.333'
> >
> > Similarly for the "back" grid.
> >
> > Thank you in advance for your help!
> >
> > Bruno
> >
> > --
> > Dr.-Ing. Bruno Bueno
> > Solar Facades
> > Division Thermal Systems and Buildings
> > Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems ISE
> > Heidenhofstr. 2, 79110 Freiburg, Germany
> > Phone: +49(0)761 4588 5377
> > bruno.bueno at ise.fraunhofer.de
> > www.ise.fraunhofer.de
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Radiance-general mailing list
> > Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> > http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20131123/ffdac4b7/attachment.html>