[Radiance-general] Subsurface scattering in Radiance

T.Charles at maxfordham.com T.Charles at maxfordham.com
Thu Dec 12 00:12:07 PST 2013


Hi Roland,
Thanks for this perspective, good to know the subject is of interest and 
thanks for your work on the photon map module.
Thanks Greg for your response. I was not asking anyone to do it, just 
wanted to collect the community views on the feasibility and see whether a 
collaborative development could interest some of you. I might investigate 
this further.
Regards,
Thibault





42-43 Gloucester Crescent
London
NW1 7PE
T +44 (0) 20 7267 5161
F +44 (0) 20 7482 0329
maxfordham.com

Max Fordham LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership. Registered in England 
and Wales Number OC300026
Registered office 42-43 Gloucester Crescent, London, NW1 7PE




From:   Schregle Roland HSLU T&A <roland.schregle at hslu.ch>
To:     Radiance general discussion 
<radiance-general at radiance-online.org>, 
Date:   11/12/2013 17:59
Subject:        Re: [Radiance-general] Subsurface scattering in Radiance



On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:15:56 +0100, Greg Ward <gregoryjward at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I don't think photon mapping will handle this, either.  It's really 
> outside the scope of an architectural rendering package.  Subsurface 
> scattering needs to be implemented at a fundamental materials level, and 
 
> involves gathering contributions from nearby a hit point in a 
> geometry-aware fashion.  Not to say that it couldn't be done, but 
> there's no real motivation to add it to Radiance.

Hi all,

funny this discussion should come up, because the issue of subsurface
scattering was recently raised in our department precisely within an
architectural context. Lars Grobe conducted some tests with the "mist"
primitive, but the results weren't convincing.

Wann Jensen has proposed a BSSRDF and a photon mapping approach to model
subsurface scattering, so it is doable, but not with the current photon
map implementation; it would require adding the BSSRDF itself plus the
appropriate photon scattering routines. The flux carried within the
material would then be obtained from volume photons, which are already
built in.

Having said that, while we're planning a few (overdue) extensions to the
photon map, subsurface scattering currently doesn't have a high priority.

See ya,

--Roland


-- 
Dr. Roland Schregle
Senior Research Associate

T direct: +41 41 349 39 77
roland.schregle at hslu.ch

Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts
School of Engineering and Architecture
CC Envelopes and Solar Energy (EASE)
Technikumstrasse 21, CH-6048 Horw
T +41 41 349 33 11, F +41 41 349 39 60
www.hslu.ch/ccease

_______________________________________________
Radiance-general mailing list
Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20131212/6fb65ddd/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 25055 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20131212/6fb65ddd/attachment-0001.jpe>


More information about the Radiance-general mailing list