[Radiance-general] possible inconsistency of bin numbers between BSDF and kelms_int.cal

[Greg Ward]

Hi Jia,

There was a bug in the recently-added reciprocity calculation in dctimestep, which I hope I have now corrected.  Please try this again with the copy of dctimestep.c from the current HEAD.

Thanks for pointing out the problem.

Best,
-Greg

> From: Jia Hu <hujia06 at gmail.com>
> Date: October 22, 2012 10:28:52 AM PDT
> 
> Hi Andy:
> 
> Yes. But currently the fact is that if the back transmission data is missing, the results are zero even if there are front transmission data. That is why I am confused.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jia
> 
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Andrew McNeil <amcneil at lbl.gov> wrote:
> dctimestep originally used just the front transmission data, and if front transmission data were missing the result was zero.  I think Greg has recently made changes so that it can us back transmission too.  Try with the HEAD.
> 
> Andy
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20121023/57373eb7/attachment.html>