[Radiance-general] different results

Greg Ward gregoryjward at gmail.com
Sun Nov 4 08:18:34 PST 2012


Just a side-note to this:  It is good etiquette to post your scene and related files at a website rather than attaching them to your e-mail.  Most e-mail programs will strip attachments, and we need to be considerate of those who pay for storage or have slow connections.

Best,
-Greg

> From: "Lars O. Grobe" <grobe at gmx.net>
> Date: November 4, 2012 6:56:35 AM PST
> 
> Dear Shailan,
> 
> it will be difficult to help you with this:
> 
> 1) We do not really know the problem. What means different results - are we talking about 1000%, 10%, 0.1%?
> 
> 2) We do not know the scene (model) and simulation paramaters. Do you use a mirror (secondary light source), is direct sun considered, are you modeling the sun (if it is existing in the model) by a small light source or as contribution to Tregenza patches...? You attached some .eco-files, which probably can be opened in Ecotec, but as a Radiance user I cannot even open those.
> 
> So my advice: Give a really clear description of the problem, and provide us with information to reproduce it. E.g. a Radiance scene description together with the parameters you are using.
> 
> Cheers, Lars.
> 



More information about the Radiance-general mailing list