[Radiance-general] RE: GenCumulativeSky - follow-up questions
Kam Shing Leung
citykam at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 30 05:30:16 PST 2010
Dear Alstan and all,
Thanks a lot for your quick response. It works after I add ".\" in front of the
file name.
May I ask a couple of follow-up questions?
Q1. I tried to generate cumulative skies for direct radiation (binned) for
different periods of time in a year. They all give the same results. Is it not
possible to specify the time and day period for direct radiation?
Q2. I created angular fisheye views of the sky dome (180-deg spread with the
centre at the zenith) and found some anomaly that I can't explain:
Direct -
a. All sun paths are found within approx. 45 degrees from the zenith. It
looks like a normal sunpath diagram being "cropped", leaving a circular area in
the middle. I changed the view direct (-vd) and it's still the case (i.e. not a
view setting problem)
b. The sun paths are almost continuous rather than in form 5-degree "bins"
Diffuse -
a. The lowest row of the 145-patch sky dome is particularly bright on the left
and right sides (i.e. west and east sides, respectively) . It appears under
both Singaporean and San Francisco skies. Would it be related to the limitation
on <6 degrees sun angle?
Thanks in advance for bearing with this long list of question. It would be
great if there is a "manual" that can be made available - it's a useful tool!
Cheers,
Kam
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20101130/fc2b1acf/attachment.html
More information about the Radiance-general
mailing list