[Radiance-general] gendaylit problems
John Mardaljevic
jm at dmu.ac.uk
Tue Oct 27 05:10:33 PDT 2009
Hi (Zdravo) Marija,
As far as I could tell, the fix given by Perez in the erratum (link
below) is in the code:
/* correction de modele de Perez solar energy ...*/
if ( (epsilon > 1.065) && (epsilon < 2.8) )
http://www.asrc.cestm.albany.edu/perez/publications/Solar%20Resource%20Assessment%20and%20Modeling/More%20Papers%20on%20Resource%20Assessment%20and%20Satellites/erratum-93.pdf
Note that the AW model was based *only* on data from Berkeley. This
is perhaps why the overcast conditions in the AW model are different
to CIE overcast (which has been validated as a reliable overcast model
for many European sites). See:
J. Mardaljevic. Sky model blends for predicting internal illuminance:
a comparison founded on the BRE-IDMP dataset. Journal of Building
Performance Simulation, 1(3):163–173, 2008.
E-mail me if you can't get access to this journal.
-John
-----------------------------------------------
Dr. John Mardaljevic
Reader in Daylight Modelling
Institute of Energy and Sustainable Development
De Montfort University
The Gateway
Leicester
LE1 9BH, UK
+44 (0) 116 257 7972
+44 (0) 116 257 7981 (fax)
jm at dmu.ac.uk
http://www.iesd.dmu.ac.uk/~jm
More information about the Radiance-general
mailing list