[Radiance-general] Art work surface

Fitzsimmons, Rob rob.fitzsimmons at Summit.Fiserv.com
Fri May 26 20:24:08 CEST 2006


 
Here is version 1 of our remodel

http://www.geocities.com/rastermon/Version1.html
The designer is using Sketchup and I'm rendering with - of course -
Radiance.
Composite done in photosop.
 Radiance view did not match pic, so I did a little skewing in PS.

Thanks for all the input on art lighting - I'll post  pics as it comes
along.

Rob
-----Original Message-----
From: Lars Grobe
To: Radiance general discussion
Sent: 5/26/2006 2:05 AM
Subject: Re: RE: [Radiance-general] Art work surface

Hi Thomas!

> They were directed to north because they had to be huge and
> you had to avoid direct sunlight. Northern light also varies
> not much over the day.

Ok... that is what I wanted to describe as continous ;-)))

> Only directional light would indeed be irritating but you
> need a certain directional component to render the shape.

Well, if you have no clear window at all you also might get mad.

> No! Don't use that stuff! We had an exhibition pavillion in
> my university built with honeycomb insulation between two
> glass profiles. The profiles alone might have worked well but
> the building inspector insisted in an insulation of the wall.
> The honeycombs diffuse the light so much that there is hardly
> a directional component left. It looks odd and the sculptures
> and architectural modells are shaded poorly even if the interior
> is rather bright.

That sounds interesting, as I actually do not have experienced such a
room. Were the panels used on all sides or to one direction only? My
idea was to have a big diffuse-translucent wall (only) to north. Also
Ithink that for an exhibition pavillion, especially for architectural
models, a diffuse environment is a terrific idea. All those I know use
spots to take fotos of their models and to show them (of course with a
diffuse environment around).

But I really wonder on the impact of these panels on color, did you
experience any noticable effect? It would also interesting to know what
happens after some years, at least with those based on plastics (I would
not worry about the glass-based products, but I am also not sure here).
Christopher has done validation work on such panels, maybe he has more
to say about it.


> 
> Thomas
> 
>
************************************************************************
***********
> This e-mail, (and any attachments) is confidential and may be
privileged. 
> It may be read, copied and used by the intended addressee only.  If
you
> have received this in error please contact BDP immediately. 
> 
> If you have any queries, please contact the sender.
>
************************************************************************
***********
> Building Design Partnership
> Registered in England No 2207415:
> Registered Office: Building Design Partnership Ltd, Sunlight House, PO
Box
> 85, Quay Street, Manchester, M60 3JA, http://www.bdp.co.uk
>
************************************************************************
***********
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general

_______________________________________________
Radiance-general mailing list
Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general



More information about the Radiance-general mailing list