[Radiance-general] sorry, again a question about gold mosaic
Lars O. Grobe
grobe at gmx.net
Sat May 21 14:57:08 CEST 2005
Hi List!
I am sorry, I have asked so often about this, but as I have to model a
room with a lot of gold mosaic, which is not an easy material do
define, here is one more question about this...
So far, I use a gold material (which has 100% specular reflection)
together with a high roughness value (0.03). This gives me some visual
impression of a mosiac and the right color of gold (I use the measured
values by Andrew Glassner).
However, as for the indirect calculation, I wonder if I am completely
wrong with this material. I have a specularity of 1.0 in my definition,
while the effect of using this material as mosaic (not large, plane
sheets of gold ;-) will in fact give a diffuse reflection in the large
scale of e.g. a complete dome. So there is a difference in the material
behaviour between the scale of a single piece of mosaic (which is more
or less planar and may have this 100% specular reflectivity) and the
scale of the building, where the material is "mosaic" consisting of
millions of pieces, and diffuse.
I once planned to do some experiments with some kind of a "virtual
photometer", where I could measure the output of a modeled sample from
various directions. I did not do so simply because of a lack of time.
And I was quite pleased by the effect of using the roughness parameter.
Now I am worried, because I wonder if the diffuse effect of the mosaic
will be neglected in the indirect calculation?
Thank You for any help, have a nice week-end, CU Lars.
More information about the Radiance-general
mailing list