[Radiance-general] super high res images

[Jack de Valpine]

Ack, that is pretty bad!

    22,000x22,000 at 3X or 66,000x66,000


Jack de Valpine wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> What wisdom do people have about generating absurdely (IMHO) large 
> images (for example 22,000 x 22,000 at 3 times over sample, eg running 
> at 76,000 x 76,000). The best thing that I can think of is to render 
> the images as a seriese of sub views (tiles) with appropriate shift 
> and lifts so the final image can be composed from the sub pieces. If 
> the tiles are all pfilted (using the same exposure settings) to their 
> final size prior to composing the final image will there be problems 
> at the tile edges?
>
> Thanks for any input/guidance,
>
> -Jack de Valpine
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>
>

-- 
#	John E. de Valpine
#	president
#
#	visarc incorporated
#	http://www.visarc.com
#
#	channeling technology for superior design and construction

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-general/attachments/20050120/9e0bc367/attachment.html