[Radiance-general] ximage vs. pcond
Roland William Fleming
roland.fleming at tuebingen.mpg.de
Mon Apr 18 12:44:02 CEST 2005
Hi ---
Why does pcond produce a (slightly) different tonemapping from ximage
-e auto ? The contrast is better with ximage and I would like to take
the output as my final image. Is there an easy way to do this ? I use
the default values for all options.
A few things I've tried:
ximage -e auto hdr.pic
# produces nice high-contrast rendition of image
pcond hdr.pic ldr.pic
ximage ldr.pic
# tonemapping is inferior
ra_tiff ldr.pic ldr.tif
xview ldr,tif
# tonemapping is still not good. This suggests that it is not the 2.2
gamma of ximage that makes the images look good, because ra_tiff also
uses 2.2 gamma correction (according to the documentation).
ximage -e auto ldr,pic
# tonemapping is better, but still not quite as good as the original.
Thanks for any tips!
Roland Fleming
r o l a n d f l e m i n g p h d
r e s e a r c h s c i e n t i s t
m a x p l a n c k i n s t i t u t e f o r b i o l o g i c a l
c y b e r n e t i c s
s p e m a n n s t r . 3 8
7 2 0 7 6 t u e b i n g e n
g e r m a n y
t e l :: [ + 4 9 ] 0 7 0 7 1 6 0 1 - 6 0 9
More information about the Radiance-general
mailing list