[Radiance-general] Fwd: errors from hdrgen
Axel Jacobs
a.jacobs at londonmet.ac.uk
Thu Jun 10 16:25:36 CEST 2004
Martin Matusiak wrote:
>"Poor covergence of order 1 fit"
>
>
Ignore this one, this is a debug message and only means that things are
not running as smoothly as they could.
>"Cannot solve for response function"
>
>
That is more of a problem. Essentially, the dynamic range of the images
has gaps between them or is clipped on either side of the range. Try:
- Taking images at smaller f-stop intervals
- remove images that are too bright or too dark
- include darker or lighter images.
We keep having this problem with webhdr, but here doesn't seem to be a
rule of thumb for getting it right. If the worst comes to the worst, you
can disable hdrgen's built-in auto exposure routine and do a hand-jobby,
but this is more difficult.
https://luminance.londonmet.ac.uk/webhdr/
You should also save the coefficients from a run that doesn't create any
errors/warning and re-use them when you do get them. Please note that
the response curve is/can be different even between two cameras of the
same model/make, so don't mix-n-match them.
Axel
More information about the Radiance-general
mailing list