[Radiance-general] Intel P4 versus AMD 64 bit processor
David Janello
djanello at yahoo.com
Thu Dec 2 16:57:11 CET 2004
The opteron results were with gcc, my experience with
(non-radiance) benchmarks on opteron 246 and 250s
shows significant improvements using the intel
compiler in 32-bit mode and the PathScale compiler in
64-bit mode.
Don't know how much of an improvement intel/pathscale
will provide on radiance, but previous experience with
similar application profiles shows a performance boost
of 15-45% depending on the specific application.
--David Janello
www.spreadhunter.com
www.argon-tech.com
--- Mark Stock <mstock at umich.edu> wrote:
> Iebele,
>
> Most of the results on
>
> http://mark.technolope.org/pages/rad_bench.html
>
> are from Linux workstations with 2.4 kernels. The
> fastest
> processors for the particular scene tested are
> Opteron 246s,
> though there are few recent tests of P4s to compare
> with.
>
> Is there anyone out there with a fast P4?
>
> Mark
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, atelier iebele abel wrote:
>
> > Does anybody know if Radiance runs better using
> Linux on a AMD 64 bit
> > processor, or is Intel P4 the better choice?
> >
> > -Iebele
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Radiance-general mailing list
> > Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
> >
>
http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> Radiance-general at radiance-online.org
>
http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
More information about the Radiance-general
mailing list