[Radiance-general] radiance 3.5: oconv and memory

Sun, 23 Mar 2003 17:21:18 -0800

Hi Lars,

Try running with the old -r 16384 -n 5 and see if that makes the 
difference.  I can't think what else is new, except the maximum set 
size was increased.

-Greg

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Lars Grobe <[email protected]>
> Date: Sun Mar 23, 2003  3:22:30  PM US/Pacific
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Radiance-general] radiance 3.5: oconv and memory
> Reply-To: [email protected]
>
> Hi!
>
> While building binaries, I did some testing on the new release with 
> some of
> my
> bigger scenes. I find that the new oconv from 3.5 takes really much 
> memory,
> in
> fact, more than I have installed in my poor old k6-2 (96MB). So I 
> cannot
> build
> an octree from a scene that was fine with 3.4.1.
>
> Is this only a result of changes in the -n and -r defaults? Or ist the 
> new
> oconv
> more memory-hungry then older releases in general? I hope to get my 
> scene
> built with the new 3.5 soon on x86,  as I will be able to tar a binary
> distribution
> than.
>
> CU, Lars.
>
> -- 
> +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more  http://www.gmx.net +++
> Bitte l�cheln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiance-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-general
>