| 300 |
|
* is it specified what we should assume for missing pixels. This |
| 301 |
|
* is undoubtedly the most brain-dead format I've ever encountered. |
| 302 |
|
*/ |
| 303 |
< |
sp = br->scanline; |
| 303 |
> |
sp = (int8 *)br->scanline; |
| 304 |
|
n = br->hdr->width; |
| 305 |
|
if (br->hdr->compr == BI_RLE4) |
| 306 |
|
n = (n + 1) >> 1; |
| 736 |
|
* (0x0000) except for the last, which ends in a bitmap break |
| 737 |
|
* (0x0001). We don't support RLE4 at all; it's too awkward. |
| 738 |
|
*/ |
| 739 |
< |
sp = bw->scanline; |
| 739 |
> |
sp = (const int8 *)bw->scanline; |
| 740 |
|
n = bw->hdr->width; |
| 741 |
|
while (n > 0) { |
| 742 |
|
int cnt, val; |
