1154 |
|
<p> |
1155 |
|
|
1156 |
|
<dt> |
1157 |
< |
<a NAME="sBSDF"> |
1158 |
< |
<b>sBSDF</b> |
1157 |
> |
<a NAME="aBSDF"> |
1158 |
> |
<b>aBSDF</b> |
1159 |
|
</a> |
1160 |
|
|
1161 |
|
<dd> |
1162 |
< |
The sBSDF material is identical to the BSDF type with two |
1162 |
> |
The aBSDF material is identical to the BSDF type with two |
1163 |
|
important differences. First, proxy geometry is not |
1164 |
|
supported, so there is no thickness parameter. Second, an |
1165 |
< |
sBSDF is assumed to have some specular through component, |
1165 |
> |
aBSDF is assumed to have some specular through component |
1166 |
> |
(the ’a’ stands for "aperture"), |
1167 |
|
which is treated specially during the direct calculation |
1168 |
|
and when viewing the material. Based on the BSDF data, the |
1169 |
|
coefficient of specular transmission is determined and used |
1170 |
|
for modifying unscattered shadow and view rays. |
1171 |
|
|
1172 |
|
<pre> |
1173 |
< |
mod sBSDF id |
1173 |
> |
mod aBSDF id |
1174 |
|
5+ BSDFfile ux uy uz funcfile transform |
1175 |
|
0 |
1176 |
|
0|3|6|9 |
1182 |
|
<p> |
1183 |
|
If a material has no specular transmitted component, it is |
1184 |
|
much better to use the BSDF type with a zero thickness |
1185 |
< |
than to use sBSDF. |
1185 |
> |
than to use aBSDF. |
1186 |
|
<p> |
1187 |
|
|
1188 |
|
<dt> |