[ViewVC] Diff of: radiance/ray/doc/ray.1

Comparing ray/doc/ray.1 (file contents):
Revision 1.21 by greg, Wed Jun 22 00:13:25 2011 UTC vs.
Revision 1.49 by greg, Fri May 30 16:35:52 2025 UTC

-<
+.\" RCSid "$Id"
->
+.\" RCSid "$Id$"
+.\" Print using the -ms macro package
-<
+.DA 2/17/2011
->
+.DA 12/09/2024
+.LP
-<
+.tl """Copyright \(co 2011 Regents, University of California
->
+.tl """Copyright \(co 2024 Regents, University of California
+.sp 2
+.TL
+The
+red green blue
+.DE
-+
+While alternate materials that are reflective will appear as normal,
-+
+indirect rays will use the mirror's reflectance rather than the
-+
+alternate type.
-+
+Transmitting materials are an exception, where both transmission and
-+
+reflection will use the alternate type for all rays not specifically
-+
+targeting virtual light sources.
-+
+In this case, it is important that any reflections be purely specular
-+
+(mirror-like) and equal to the mirror's reflectivity
-+
+to maintain a valid result.
-+
+A pure diffuse reflection may be added if desired.
-+
+.PP
-+
+The mirror material type reflects light sources only from the front side
-+
+of a surface, regardless of any alternate material.
-+
+If virtual source generation is desired on both sides, two coincident
-+
+surfaces with opposite normal orientations may be employed to achieve
-+
+this effect.
-+
+The reflectance and alternate material type may be
-+
+different for the overlapped surfaces,
-+
+and the two sides will behave accordingly.
+.LP
+.UL Prism1
+.PP
+red green blue spec urough vrough trans tspec
+.DE
+.LP
-+
+.UL Ashik2
-+
+.PP
-+
+Ashik2 is the anisotropic reflectance model by Ashikhmin & Shirley.
-+
+The string arguments are the same as for plastic2, but the real
-+
+arguments have additional flexibility to specify the specular color.
-+
+Also, rather than roughness, specular power is used, which has no
-+
+physical meaning other than larger numbers are equivalent to a smoother
-+
+surface.
-+
+Unlike other material types, total reflectance is the sum of
-+
+diffuse and specular colors, and should be adjusted accordingly.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod ashik2 id
-+
++ ux uy uz funcfile transform
-+
-+
+dred dgrn dblu sred sgrn sblu u-power v-power
-+
+.DE
-+
+.LP
-+
+.UL WGMDfunc
-+
+.PP
-+
+WGMDfunc is a more programmable version of trans2,
-+
+with separate modifier paths and variables to control each component.
-+
+(WGMD stands for Ward-Geisler-Moroder-Duer, which is the basis for
-+
+this empirical model, similar to the previous ones beside Ashik2.)\0
-+
+The specification of this material is given below.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod WGMDfunc id
-+
++ rs_mod  rs  rs_urough rs_vrough
-+
+    ts_mod  ts  ts_urough ts_vrough
-+
+    td_mod
-+
+    ux uy uz  funcfile  transform
-+
-+
++  rfdif gfdif bfdif
-+
+    rbdif gbdif bbdif
-+
+    rtdif gtdif btdif
-+
+    A10 ..
-+
+.DE
-+
+The sum of specular reflectance (
-+
+.I rs
-+
+), specular transmittance (
-+
+.I ts
-+
+), diffuse reflectance (
-+
+.I "rfdif gfdif bfdif"
-+
+for front and
-+
+.I "rbdif gbdif bbdif"
-+
+for back)
-+
+and diffuse transmittance (
-+
+.I "rtdif gtdif btdif"
-+
+) should be less than 1 for each
-+
+channel.
-+
+.PP
-+
+Unique to this material, separate modifier channels are
-+
+provided for each component.
-+
+The main modifier is used on the diffuse reflectance, both
-+
+front and back.
-+
+The
-+
+.I rs_mod
-+
+modifier is used for specular reflectance.
-+
+If "void" is given for
-+
+.I rs_mod,
-+
+then the specular reflection color will be white.
-+
+The special "inherit" keyword may also be given, in which case
-+
+specular reflectance will share the main modifier.
-+
+This behavior is replicated for the specular transmittance modifier
-+
+.I ts_mod,
-+
+which has its own independent roughness expressions.
-+
+Finally, the diffuse transmittance modifier is given as
-+
+.I td_mod,
-+
+which may also be "void" or "inherit".
-+
+Note that any spectra or color for specular components must be
-+
+carried by the named modifier(s).
-+
+.PP
-+
+The main advantage to this material over BRTDfunc and
-+
+other programmable types described below is that the specular sampling is
-+
+well-defined, so that all components are fully computed.
-+
+.LP
+.UL Dielectric
+.PP
+A dielectric material is transparent, and it refracts light
+Unlike other data-driven material types, the BSDF type is fully
+supported and all parts of the distribution are properly sampled.
+.LP
-+
+.UL aBSDF
-+
+.PP
-+
+The aBSDF material is identical to the BSDF type with two important
-+
+differences.
-+
+First, proxy geometry is not supported, so there is no thickness parameter.
-+
+Second, an aBSDF is assumed to have some specular through component
-+
+(the 'a' stands for "aperture"), which
-+
+is treated specially during the direct calculation and when viewing the
-+
+material.
-+
+Based on the BSDF data, the coefficient of specular transmission is
-+
+determined and used for modifying unscattered shadow and view rays.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod aBSDF id
-+
++ BSDFfile ux uy uz funcfile transform
-+
-+
+|3|6|9
-+
+     rfdif gfdif bfdif
-+
+     rbdif gbdif bbdif
-+
+     rtdif gtdif btdif
-+
+.DE
-+
+.LP
-+
+If a material has no specular transmitted component, it is much better
-+
+to use the BSDF type with a zero thickness than to use aBSDF.
-+
+.LP
+.UL Antimatter
+.PP
+Antimatter is a material that can "subtract" volumes from other volumes.
+The first modifier will also be used to shade the area leaving the
+antimatter volume and entering the regular volume.
+If mod1 is void, the antimatter volume is completely invisible.
-<
+Antimatter does not work properly with the material type "trans",
-<
+and multiple antimatter surfaces should be disjoint.
->
+If shading is desired at antimatter surfaces, it is important
->
+that the related volumes are closed with outward-facing normals.
->
+Antimatter surfaces should not intersect with other antimatter boundaries,
->
+and it is unwise to use the same modifier in nested antimatter volumes.
+The viewpoint must be outside all volumes concerned for a correct
+rendering.
+.NH 3
+font such as hexbit4x1.fnt, calls for uniform spacing.
+Reasonable magnitudes for proportional spacing are
+between 0.1 (for tightly spaced characters) and 0.3 (for wide spacing).
-+
+.LP
-+
+.UL Spectrum
-+
+.PP
-+
+The spectrum primitive is the most basic type for introducing spectral
-+
+color to a material.
-+
+Since materials only provide RGB parameters, spectral patterns
-+
+are the only way to superimpose wavelength-dependent behavior.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod spectrum id
-+
-+
-+
++ nmA nmB s1 s2 .. sN
-+
+.DE
-+
+The first two real arguments indicate the extrema of the
-+
+spectral range in nanometers.
-+
+Subsequent real values correspond to multipliers at each wavelength.
-+
+The nmA wavelength may be greater or less than nmB,
-+
+but they may not be equal, and their ordering matches
-+
+the order of the spectral values.
-+
+A minimum of 3 values must be given, which would act
-+
+more or less the same as a constant RGB multiplier.
-+
+As with RGB values, spectral quantities normally range between 0
-+
+and 1 at each wavelength, or average to 1.0 against a standard
-+
+sensitivity functions such as V(lambda).
-+
+The best results obtain when the spectral range and number
-+
+of samples match rendering options, though resampling will handle
-+
+any differences, zero-filling wavelenths outside the nmA to nmB
-+
+range.
-+
+A warning will be issued if the given wavelength range does not
-+
+adequately cover the visible spectrum.
-+
+.LP
-+
+.UL Specfile
-+
+.PP
-+
+The specfile primitive is equivalent to the spectrum type, but
-+
+the wavelength range and values are contained in a 1-dimensional
-+
+data file.
-+
+This may be a more convenient way to specify a spectral color,
-+
+especially one corresponding to a standard illuminant such as D65
-+
+or a library of measured spectra.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod specfile id
-+
+datafile
-+
-+
-+
+.DE
-+
+As with the spectrum type, rendering wavelengths outside the defined
-+
+range will be zero-filled.
-+
+Unlike the spectrum type, the file may contain non-uniform samples.
-+
+.LP
-+
+.UL Specfunc
-+
+.PP
-+
+The specfunc primitive offers dynamic control over a spectral
-+
+pattern, similar to the colorfunc type.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod specfunc id
-+
++ sfunc funcfile transform
-+
-+
++ nmA nmB A3 ..
-+
+.DE
-+
+Like the spectrum primitive, the wavelength range is specified
-+
+in the first two real arguments, and additional real values are
-+
+set in the evaluation context.
-+
+This function is fed a wavelenth sample
-+
+between nmA and nmB as its only argument,
-+
+and it returns the corresponding spectral intensity.
-+
+.LP
-+
+.UL Specdata
-+
+.PP
-+
+Specdata is like brightdata and colordata, but with more
-+
+than 3 specular samples.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod specdata id
-+
++n+
-+
+        func datafile
-+
+        funcfile x1 x2 .. xn transform
-+
-+
+m A1 A2 .. Am
-+
+.DE
-+
+The data file must have one more dimension than the coordinate
-+
+variable count, as this final dimension corresponds to the covered
-+
+spectrum.
-+
+The starting and ending wavelengths are specified in "datafile"
-+
+as well as the number of spectral samples.
-+
+The function "func" will be called with two parameters, the
-+
+interpolated spectral value for the current coordinate and the
-+
+associated wavelength.
-+
+If the spectrum is broken into 12 components, then 12 calls
-+
+will be made to "func" for the relevant ray evaluation.
-+
+.LP
-+
+.UL Specpict
-+
+.PP
-+
+Specpict is a special case of specdata, where the pattern is
-+
+a hyperspectral image stored in the common-exponent file format.
-+
+The dimensions of the image data are determined by the picture
-+
+just as with the colorpict primitive.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod specpict id
 +
-+
+        func specfile
-+
+        funcfile u v transform
-+
-+
+m A1 A2 .. Am
-+
+.DE
-+
+The function "func" is called with the interpolated pixel value
-+
+and the wavelength sample in nanometers, the same as specdata,
-+
+with as many calls made as there are components in "specfile".
+.NH 3
+Mixtures
+.PP
+A mixture is a blend of one or more materials or textures and patterns.
-+
+Blended materials should not be light source types or virtual source types.
+The basic types are given below.
+.LP
+.UL Mixfunc
+in Lausanne, Switzerland.
+.NH 1
+References
-+
+.LP
-+
+Ward, Gregory J., Bruno Bueno, David Geisler-Moroder,
-+
+Lars O. Grobe, Jacob C. Jonsson, Eleanor
-+
+S. Lee, Taoning Wang, Helen Rose Wilson,
-+
+``Daylight Simulation Workflows Incorporating
-+
+Measured Bidirectional Scattering Distribution Functions,''
-+
+.I "Energy & Buildings",
-+
+Vol. 259, No. 111890, 2022.
-+
+.LP
-+
+Wang, Taoning, Gregory Ward, Eleanor Lee,
-+
+``Efficient modeling of optically-complex, non-coplanar
-+
+exterior shading: Validation of matrix algebraic methods,''
-+
+.I "Energy & Buildings",
-+
+vol. 174, pp. 464-83, Sept. 2018.
-+
+.LP
-+
+Lee, Eleanor S., David Geisler-Moroder, Gregory Ward,
-+
+``Modeling the direct sun component in buildings using matrix
-+
+algebraic approaches: Methods and validation,''
-+
+.I Solar Energy,
-+
+vol. 160, 15 January 2018, pp 380-395.
-+
+.LP
-+
+Ward, G., M. Kurt & N. Bonneel,
-+
+``Reducing Anisotropic BSDF Measurement to Common Practice,''
-+
+.I Workshop on Material Appearance Modeling,
-+
+.
-+
+.LP
-+
+McNeil, A., C.J. Jonsson, D. Appelfeld, G. Ward, E.S. Lee,
-+
+``A validation of a ray-tracing tool used to generate
-+
+bi-directional scattering distribution functions for
-+
+complex fenestration systems,''
-+
+.I "Solar Energy",
-+
+, 404-14, November 2013.
-+
+.LP
-+
+Ward, G., R. Mistrick, E.S. Lee, A. McNeil, J. Jonsson,
-+
+``Simulating the Daylight Performance of Complex Fenestration Systems
-+
+Using Bidirectional Scattering Distribution Functions within Radiance,''
-+
+.I "Leukos",
-+
+(4),
-+
+April 2011.
+.LP
+Cater, K., A. Chalmers, G. Ward,
+``Detail to Attention: Exploiting Visual Tasks for Selective Rendering,''

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing ray/doc/ray.1 (file contents): Revision 1.21 by greg, Wed Jun 22 00:13:25 2011 UTC vs. Revision 1.49 by greg, Fri May 30 16:35:52 2025 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing ray/doc/ray.1 (file contents):
Revision 1.21 by greg, Wed Jun 22 00:13:25 2011 UTC vs.
Revision 1.49 by greg, Fri May 30 16:35:52 2025 UTC