[ViewVC] Diff of: radiance/ray/doc/ray.1

Comparing ray/doc/ray.1 (file contents):
Revision 1.17 by greg, Fri Mar 12 19:57:58 2010 UTC vs.
Revision 1.37 by greg, Mon Oct 8 20:18:27 2018 UTC

-<
+.\" RCSid "$Id"
->
+.\" RCSid "$Id$"
+.\" Print using the -ms macro package
-<
+.DA 3/12/2010
->
+.DA 10/08/2018
+.LP
-<
+.tl """Copyright \(co 2010 Regents, University of California
->
+.tl """Copyright \(co 2018 Regents, University of California
+.sp 2
+.TL
+The
+red green blue spec urough vrough trans tspec
+.DE
+.LP
-+
+.UL Ashik2
-+
+.PP
-+
+Ashik2 is the anisotropic reflectance model by Ashikhmin & Shirley.
-+
+The string arguments are the same as for plastic2, but the real
-+
+arguments have additional flexibility to specify the specular color.
-+
+Also, rather than roughness, specular power is used, which has no
-+
+physical meaning other than larger numbers are equivalent to a smoother
-+
+surface.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod ashik2 id
-+
++ ux uy uz funcfile transform
-+
-+
+dred dgrn dblu sred sgrn sblu u-power v-power
-+
+.DE
-+
+.LP
+.UL Dielectric
+.PP
+A dielectric material is transparent, and it refracts light
++ red green blue rspec trans tspec A7 ..
+.DE
+.LP
-+
+.UL BSDF
-+
+.PP
-+
+The BSDF material type loads an XML (eXtensible Markup Language)
-+
+file describing a bidirectional scattering distribution function.
-+
+Real arguments to this material may define additional
-+
+diffuse components that augment the BSDF data.
-+
+String arguments are used to define thickness for proxied
-+
+surfaces and the "up" orientation for the material.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod BSDF id
-+
++ thick BSDFfile ux uy uz funcfile transform
-+
-+
+|3|6|9
-+
+     rfdif gfdif bfdif
-+
+     rbdif gbdif bbdif
-+
+     rtdif gtdif btdif
-+
+.DE
-+
+The first string argument is a "thickness" parameter that may be used
-+
+to hide detail geometry being proxied by an aggregate BSDF material.
-+
+If a view or shadow ray hits a BSDF proxy with non-zero thickness,
-+
+it will pass directly through as if the surface were not there.
-+
+Similar to the illum type, this permits direct viewing and
-+
+shadow testing of complex geometry.
-+
+The BSDF is used when a scattered (indirect) ray hits the surface,
-+
+and any transmitted sample rays will be offset by the thickness amount
-+
+to avoid the hidden geometry and gather samples from the other side.
-+
+In this manner, BSDF surfaces can improve the results for indirect
-+
+scattering from complex systems without sacrificing appearance or
-+
+shadow accuracy.
-+
+If the BSDF has transmission and back-side reflection data,
-+
+a parallel BSDF surface may be
-+
+placed slightly less than the given thickness away from the front surface
-+
+to enclose the complex geometry on both sides.
-+
+The sign of the thickness is important, as it indicates whether the
-+
+proxied geometry is behind the BSDF surface (when thickness is positive)
-+
+or in front (when thickness is negative).
-+
+.LP
-+
+The second string argument is the name of the BSDF file, which is
-+
+found in the usual auxiliary locations.
-+
+The following three string parameters name variables for an "up" vector,
-+
+which together with the surface normal, define the
-+
+local coordinate system that orients the BSDF.
-+
+These variables, along with the thickness, are defined in a function
-+
+file given as the next string argument.
-+
+An optional transform is used to scale the thickness and reorient the up vector.
-+
+.LP
-+
+If no real arguments are given, the BSDF is used by itself to determine
-+
+reflection and transmission.
-+
+If there are at least 3 real arguments, the first triplet is an
-+
+additional diffuse reflectance for the front side.
-+
+At least 6 real arguments adds diffuse reflectance to the rear side of the surface.
-+
+If there are 9 real arguments, the final triplet will be taken as an additional
-+
+diffuse transmittance.
-+
+All diffuse components as well as the non-diffuse transmission are
-+
+modified by patterns applied to this material.
-+
+The non-diffuse reflection from either side are unaffected.
-+
+Textures perturb the effective surface normal in the usual way.
-+
+.LP
-+
+The surface normal of this type is not altered to face the incoming ray,
-+
+so the front and back BSDF reflections may differ.
-+
+(Transmission is identical front-to-back by physical law.)\0
-+
+If back visibility is turned off during rendering and there is no
-+
+transmission or back-side reflection, only then the surface will be
-+
+invisible from behind.
-+
+Unlike other data-driven material types, the BSDF type is fully
-+
+supported and all parts of the distribution are properly sampled.
-+
+.LP
-+
+.UL aBSDF
-+
+.PP
-+
+The aBSDF material is identical to the BSDF type with two important
-+
+differences.
-+
+First, proxy geometry is not supported, so there is no thickness parameter.
-+
+Second, an aBSDF is assumed to have some specular through component
-+
+(the 'a' stands for "aperture"), which
-+
+is treated specially during the direct calculation and when viewing the
-+
+material.
-+
+Based on the BSDF data, the coefficient of specular transmission is
-+
+determined and used for modifying unscattered shadow and view rays.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod aBSDF id
-+
++ BSDFfile ux uy uz funcfile transform
-+
-+
+|3|6|9
-+
+     rfdif gfdif bfdif
-+
+     rbdif gbdif bbdif
-+
+     rtdif gtdif btdif
-+
+.DE
-+
+.LP
-+
+If a material has no specular transmitted component, it is much better
-+
+to use the BSDF type with a zero thickness than to use aBSDF.
-+
+.LP
+.UL Antimatter
+.PP
+Antimatter is a material that can "subtract" volumes from other volumes.
+The first modifier will also be used to shade the area leaving the
+antimatter volume and entering the regular volume.
+If mod1 is void, the antimatter volume is completely invisible.
-<
+Antimatter does not work properly with the material type "trans",
-<
+and multiple antimatter surfaces should be disjoint.
->
+If shading is desired at antimatter surfaces, it is important
->
+that the related volumes are closed with outward-facing normals.
->
+Antimatter surfaces should not intersect with other antimatter boundaries,
->
+and it is unwise to use the same modifier in nested antimatter volumes.
+The viewpoint must be outside all volumes concerned for a correct
+rendering.
+.NH 3
+Mixtures
+.PP
+A mixture is a blend of one or more materials or textures and patterns.
-+
+Blended materials should not be light source types or virtual source types.
+The basic types are given below.
+.LP
+.UL Mixfunc
+in Lausanne, Switzerland.
+.NH 1
+References
-+
+.LP
-+
+Wang, Taoning, Gregory Ward, Eleanor Lee,
-+
+``Efficient modeling of optically-complex, non-coplanar
-+
+exterior shading: Validation of matrix algebraic methods,''
-+
+.I "Energy & Buildings",
-+
+vol. 174, pp. 464-83, Sept. 2018.
-+
+.LP
-+
+Lee, Eleanor S., David Geisler-Moroder, Gregory Ward,
-+
+``Modeling the direct sun component in buildings using matrix
-+
+algebraic approaches: Methods and validation,''
-+
+.I Solar Energy,
-+
+vol. 160, 15 January 2018, pp 380-395.
-+
+.LP
-+
+Ward, G., M. Kurt & N. Bonneel,
-+
+``Reducing Anisotropic BSDF Measurement to Common Practice,''
-+
+.I Workshop on Material Appearance Modeling,
-+
+.
-+
+.LP
-+
+McNeil, A., C.J. Jonsson, D. Appelfeld, G. Ward, E.S. Lee,
-+
+``A validation of a ray-tracing tool used to generate
-+
+bi-directional scattering distribution functions for
-+
+complex fenestration systems,''
-+
+.I "Solar Energy",
-+
+, 404-14, November 2013.
-+
+.LP
-+
+Ward, G., R. Mistrick, E.S. Lee, A. McNeil, J. Jonsson,
-+
+``Simulating the Daylight Performance of Complex Fenestration Systems
-+
+Using Bidirectional Scattering Distribution Functions within Radiance,''
-+
+.I "Leukos",
-+
+(4),
-+
+April 2011.
+.LP
+Cater, K., A. Chalmers, G. Ward,
+``Detail to Attention: Exploiting Visual Tasks for Selective Rendering,''

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines
->
+Changed lines

Comparing ray/doc/ray.1 (file contents): Revision 1.17 by greg, Fri Mar 12 19:57:58 2010 UTC vs. Revision 1.37 by greg, Mon Oct 8 20:18:27 2018 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing ray/doc/ray.1 (file contents):
Revision 1.17 by greg, Fri Mar 12 19:57:58 2010 UTC vs.
Revision 1.37 by greg, Mon Oct 8 20:18:27 2018 UTC