[ViewVC] Diff of: Development/ray/doc/ray.1

Comparing ray/doc/ray.1 (file contents):
Revision 1.26 by greg, Thu Jul 31 18:32:41 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 1.37 by greg, Mon Oct 8 20:18:27 2018 UTC

+.\" RCSid "$Id$"
+.\" Print using the -ms macro package
-<
+.DA 07/31/2014
->
+.DA 10/08/2018
+.LP
-<
+.tl """Copyright \(co 2014 Regents, University of California
->
+.tl """Copyright \(co 2018 Regents, University of California
+.sp 2
+.TL
+The
+red green blue spec urough vrough trans tspec
+.DE
+.LP
-+
+.UL Ashik2
-+
+.PP
-+
+Ashik2 is the anisotropic reflectance model by Ashikhmin & Shirley.
-+
+The string arguments are the same as for plastic2, but the real
-+
+arguments have additional flexibility to specify the specular color.
-+
+Also, rather than roughness, specular power is used, which has no
-+
+physical meaning other than larger numbers are equivalent to a smoother
-+
+surface.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod ashik2 id
-+
++ ux uy uz funcfile transform
-+
-+
+dred dgrn dblu sred sgrn sblu u-power v-power
-+
+.DE
-+
+.LP
+.UL Dielectric
+.PP
+A dielectric material is transparent, and it refracts light
+Unlike other data-driven material types, the BSDF type is fully
+supported and all parts of the distribution are properly sampled.
+.LP
-+
+.UL aBSDF
-+
+.PP
-+
+The aBSDF material is identical to the BSDF type with two important
-+
+differences.
-+
+First, proxy geometry is not supported, so there is no thickness parameter.
-+
+Second, an aBSDF is assumed to have some specular through component
-+
+(the 'a' stands for "aperture"), which
-+
+is treated specially during the direct calculation and when viewing the
-+
+material.
-+
+Based on the BSDF data, the coefficient of specular transmission is
-+
+determined and used for modifying unscattered shadow and view rays.
-+
+.DS
-+
+mod aBSDF id
-+
++ BSDFfile ux uy uz funcfile transform
-+
-+
+|3|6|9
-+
+     rfdif gfdif bfdif
-+
+     rbdif gbdif bbdif
-+
+     rtdif gtdif btdif
-+
+.DE
-+
+.LP
-+
+If a material has no specular transmitted component, it is much better
-+
+to use the BSDF type with a zero thickness than to use aBSDF.
-+
+.LP
+.UL Antimatter
+.PP
+Antimatter is a material that can "subtract" volumes from other volumes.
+The first modifier will also be used to shade the area leaving the
+antimatter volume and entering the regular volume.
+If mod1 is void, the antimatter volume is completely invisible.
-<
+Antimatter does not work properly with the material type "trans",
-<
+and multiple antimatter surfaces should be disjoint.
->
+If shading is desired at antimatter surfaces, it is important
->
+that the related volumes are closed with outward-facing normals.
->
+Antimatter surfaces should not intersect with other antimatter boundaries,
->
+and it is unwise to use the same modifier in nested antimatter volumes.
+The viewpoint must be outside all volumes concerned for a correct
+rendering.
+.NH 3
+Mixtures
+.PP
+A mixture is a blend of one or more materials or textures and patterns.
-+
+Blended materials should not be light source types or virtual source types.
+The basic types are given below.
+.LP
+.UL Mixfunc
+in Lausanne, Switzerland.
+.NH 1
+References
-+
+.LP
-+
+Wang, Taoning, Gregory Ward, Eleanor Lee,
-+
+``Efficient modeling of optically-complex, non-coplanar
-+
+exterior shading: Validation of matrix algebraic methods,''
-+
+.I "Energy & Buildings",
-+
+vol. 174, pp. 464-83, Sept. 2018.
-+
+.LP
-+
+Lee, Eleanor S., David Geisler-Moroder, Gregory Ward,
-+
+``Modeling the direct sun component in buildings using matrix
-+
+algebraic approaches: Methods and validation,''
-+
+.I Solar Energy,
-+
+vol. 160, 15 January 2018, pp 380-395.
-+
+.LP
-+
+Ward, G., M. Kurt & N. Bonneel,
-+
+``Reducing Anisotropic BSDF Measurement to Common Practice,''
-+
+.I Workshop on Material Appearance Modeling,
-+
+.
+.LP
+McNeil, A., C.J. Jonsson, D. Appelfeld, G. Ward, E.S. Lee,
+``A validation of a ray-tracing tool used to generate

Diff Legend

-–
+Removed lines
-+
+Added lines
-<
+Changed lines (old)
->
+Changed lines (new)

Comparing ray/doc/ray.1 (file contents): Revision 1.26 by greg, Thu Jul 31 18:32:41 2014 UTC vs. Revision 1.37 by greg, Mon Oct 8 20:18:27 2018 UTC

Diff Legend

Comparing ray/doc/ray.1 (file contents):
Revision 1.26 by greg, Thu Jul 31 18:32:41 2014 UTC vs.
Revision 1.37 by greg, Mon Oct 8 20:18:27 2018 UTC