1 |
greg |
1.3 |
.\" RCSid "$Id: gendaylit.1,v 1.2 2009/06/06 20:22:49 greg Exp $" |
2 |
greg |
1.2 |
.TH GENDAYLIT 1 4/12/94 "RADIANCE ISE/ADEME EXTENSIONS" |
3 |
greg |
1.1 |
.SH NAME |
4 |
greg |
1.4 |
gendaylit - generates a RADIANCE description of the daylight sources using Perez models for direct and diffuse components |
5 |
greg |
1.1 |
.SH SYNOPSIS |
6 |
greg |
1.4 |
.B "gendaylit month day hour [-P|-W|-L|-G|-E] input_value(s) " |
7 |
greg |
1.1 |
[ |
8 |
|
|
.B options |
9 |
|
|
] |
10 |
|
|
.br |
11 |
greg |
1.4 |
.B "gendaylit -ang altitude azimuth [-P|-W|-L|-G|-E] input_value(s) " |
12 |
greg |
1.1 |
[ |
13 |
|
|
.B options |
14 |
|
|
] |
15 |
|
|
.SH DESCRIPTION |
16 |
|
|
.I Gendaylit |
17 |
|
|
produces a RADIANCE scene description based on an angular distribution of the |
18 |
|
|
daylight sources (direct+diffuse) for the given atmospheric conditions |
19 |
|
|
(direct and diffuse component of the solar radiation), date and |
20 |
greg |
1.3 |
local standard time. The default output is the radiance of the sun (direct) and the sky (diffuse) |
21 |
greg |
1.1 |
integrated over the visible spectral range (380-780 nm). We have used the |
22 |
|
|
calculation of the sun's position and the ground brightness models which |
23 |
|
|
were programmed in |
24 |
|
|
.I gensky. |
25 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
The diffuse angular distribution is calculated using the Perez et al. |
27 |
|
|
sky luminance distribution model (see Solar Energy Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 235-245, 1993) which, quoting Perez, |
28 |
|
|
describes "the mean instantaneous sky luminance angular distribution patterns for all sky |
29 |
|
|
conditions from overcast to clear, through partly cloudy, skies". The correctness of the |
30 |
|
|
resulting sky radiance/luminance values in this simulation is ensured through the normalization of the modelled |
31 |
|
|
sky diffuse to the measured sky diffuse irradiances/illuminances. |
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
greg |
1.3 |
As described below, the radiation can be defined with the pairs direct-normal and diffuse-horizontal irradiance |
34 |
greg |
1.4 |
(-W option), direct-horizontal and diffuse-horizontal irradiance (-G option), direct-normal and diffuse-horizontal |
35 |
|
|
illuminance (-L option) or global-horizontal irradiation alone (-E option). The direct-normal radiation |
36 |
|
|
is understood here as the radiant flux coming from the sun and an area of approximately 3 degrees around the sun |
37 |
|
|
(World Meteorological Organisation specifications for measuring the direct radiation. |
38 |
|
|
The aperture angle of a pyrheliometer is approximately 6 degrees). |
39 |
greg |
1.1 |
To simplify the calculations for the direct radiation, the sun is represented as a disk and no |
40 |
|
|
circumsolar radiation is modelled in the 3 degrees around the sun. This means that |
41 |
|
|
all the measured/evaluated direct radiation is added to the 0.5 degree sun source. |
42 |
|
|
|
43 |
greg |
1.3 |
The direct and diffuse solar irradiances/illuminances are the inputs needed for the calculation. |
44 |
|
|
These quantities are the commonly accessible data from radiometric measurement centres or from the |
45 |
|
|
Test Reference Year. The use of such data is the recommended method for achieving the most accurate |
46 |
|
|
simulation results. |
47 |
greg |
1.1 |
|
48 |
|
|
The atmospheric conditions are modelled with the Perez et al. parametrization |
49 |
|
|
(see Solar Energy Vol. 44, No 5, pp. 271-289, 1990), which is dependent on the values for |
50 |
greg |
1.3 |
the direct-normal and the diffuse-horizontal irradiances. The three parameters |
51 |
greg |
1.1 |
are epsilon, delta and the solar zenith angle. "Epsilon variations express the transition from |
52 |
|
|
a totally overcast sky (epsilon=1) to a low turbidity clear sky (epsilon>6); delta |
53 |
|
|
variations reflect the opacity/thickness of the clouds". Delta can vary from 0.05 |
54 |
|
|
representing a dark sky to 0.5 for a very bright sky. Not every combination of |
55 |
|
|
epsilon, delta and solar zenith angle is possible. For a clear day, if |
56 |
|
|
epsilon and the solar zenith angle are known, then delta can be determined. For intermediate or overcast |
57 |
|
|
days, the sky can be dark or bright, giving a range of possible values for delta |
58 |
|
|
when epsilon and the solar zenith are fixed. The relation between epsilon and delta |
59 |
greg |
1.3 |
is represented in a figure on page 393 in Solar Energy Vol.42, No 5, 1989. Note that the |
60 |
greg |
1.1 |
epsilon parameter is a function of the solar zenith angle. It means that a clear day |
61 |
|
|
will not be defined by fixed values of epsilon and delta. Consequently the input |
62 |
|
|
parameters, epsilon, delta and the solar zenith angle, have to be determined on a graph. |
63 |
|
|
It might be easier to work with the measured direct and diffuse components (direct normal irradiance/illuminance |
64 |
|
|
and diffuse horizontal irradiance/illuminance) than with the epsilon and delta parameters. |
65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
The conversion of irradiance into illuminance for the direct and the diffuse |
67 |
|
|
components is determined by the luminous efficacy models of Perez et al. (see |
68 |
|
|
Solar Energy Vol. 44, No 5, pp. 271-289, 1990). To convert the luminance values |
69 |
|
|
into radiance integrated over the visible range of the spectrum, |
70 |
|
|
we devide the luminance by the white light efficacy factor of |
71 |
|
|
179 lm/W. This is consistent with the RADIANCE calculation because the luminance |
72 |
greg |
1.3 |
will be recalculated from the radiance integrated over the visible range by: |
73 |
greg |
1.1 |
|
74 |
|
|
luminance = radiance_integrated_over_visible_range * 179 or |
75 |
|
|
luminance = (RED*.263 + GREEN*.655 + BLUE*.082) * 179 with the capability |
76 |
|
|
to model colour (where radiance_integrated_over_visible_range == (RED + GREEN + BLUE)/3). |
77 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
From |
79 |
greg |
1.4 |
.I gensky, if the hour is preceded by a plus sign ('+'), then it is interpreted as local solar time instead of standard time. |
80 |
greg |
1.3 |
The second form gives the solar angles explicitly. The altitude is measured in degrees above the horizon, and the |
81 |
|
|
azimuth is measured in degrees west of South. The x axis points east, the y axis points north, and the z axis |
82 |
|
|
corresponds to the zenith. The actual material and surface(s) used for the sky is left up to the user. |
83 |
|
|
In addition to the specification of a sky distribution function, |
84 |
greg |
1.1 |
.I gendaylit |
85 |
greg |
1.3 |
suggests an ambient value in a comment at the beginning of the description to use with the |
86 |
greg |
1.1 |
.I \-av |
87 |
greg |
1.3 |
option of the RADIANCE rendering programs. (See rview(1) and rpict(1).) This value is the cosine-weighted |
88 |
|
|
radiance of the sky in W/sr/m^2. |
89 |
greg |
1.1 |
.PP |
90 |
|
|
.I Gendaylit |
91 |
|
|
can be used with the following input parameters. They offer three possibilities |
92 |
greg |
1.3 |
to run it: with the Perez parametrization, with irradiance values and with illuminance values. |
93 |
greg |
1.1 |
.TP 10n |
94 |
|
|
.BR \-P |
95 |
|
|
.I epsilon |
96 |
|
|
.I delta |
97 |
|
|
(these are the Perez parameters) |
98 |
|
|
.TP |
99 |
|
|
.BR \-W |
100 |
|
|
.I direct-normal-irradiance |
101 |
|
|
(W/m^2), |
102 |
|
|
.I diffuse-horizontal-irradiance |
103 |
|
|
(W/m^2) |
104 |
|
|
.TP |
105 |
greg |
1.3 |
.BR \-G |
106 |
|
|
.I direct-horizontal-irradiance |
107 |
|
|
(W/m^2), |
108 |
|
|
.I diffuse-horizontal-irradiance |
109 |
|
|
(W/m^2) |
110 |
|
|
.TP |
111 |
greg |
1.1 |
.BR \-L |
112 |
|
|
.I direct-normal-illuminance |
113 |
|
|
(lm/m^2), |
114 |
|
|
.I diffuse-horizontal-illuminance |
115 |
|
|
(lm/m^2) |
116 |
greg |
1.4 |
.TP |
117 |
|
|
.BR \-E |
118 |
|
|
.I global-horizontal-irradiance |
119 |
|
|
(W/m^2) |
120 |
|
|
.PP |
121 |
|
|
The -E option calculates the diffuse irradiance fraction with the model of Erbs, Klein and Duffie (Solar Energy 28/4, 1982), |
122 |
|
|
being followed by the calculation of the -G option. Due to the high uncertainty of the model, the results have to be handled |
123 |
|
|
with care. A second irradiance value, if available, is definitely recommended. |
124 |
greg |
1.1 |
.PP |
125 |
greg |
1.3 |
The output can be set to either the radiance of the visible radiation, the solar radiance (full spectrum) or the luminance. |
126 |
greg |
1.1 |
.TP 10n |
127 |
|
|
.BR \-O [0|1|2] |
128 |
greg |
1.3 |
(0=output in W/m^2/sr visible radiation (default), 1=output in W/m^2/sr solar radiation, 2=output in lm/m^2/sr luminance). |
129 |
greg |
1.1 |
.PP |
130 |
|
|
.I Gendaylit |
131 |
|
|
supports the following options. |
132 |
|
|
.TP 10n |
133 |
|
|
.BR \-s |
134 |
|
|
The source description of the sun is not generated. |
135 |
|
|
.TP |
136 |
greg |
1.3 |
.BR \-w |
137 |
|
|
Suppress warning messages |
138 |
|
|
.TP |
139 |
greg |
1.1 |
.BI -g \ rfl |
140 |
|
|
Average ground reflectance is |
141 |
|
|
.I rfl. |
142 |
|
|
This value is used to compute |
143 |
|
|
.I skyfunc |
144 |
|
|
when Dz is negative. |
145 |
|
|
.PP |
146 |
|
|
The following options do not apply when the solar |
147 |
|
|
altitude and azimuth are given explicitly. |
148 |
|
|
.TP |
149 |
|
|
.BI -a \ lat |
150 |
|
|
The site latitude is |
151 |
|
|
.I lat |
152 |
|
|
degrees north. |
153 |
|
|
(Use negative angle for south latitude.) |
154 |
|
|
This is used in the calculation of sun angle. |
155 |
|
|
.TP |
156 |
|
|
.BI -o \ lon |
157 |
|
|
The site longitude is |
158 |
|
|
.I lon |
159 |
|
|
degrees west. |
160 |
|
|
(Use negative angle for east longitude.) |
161 |
|
|
This is used in the calculation of solar time and sun angle. |
162 |
|
|
Be sure to give the corresponding standard meridian also! |
163 |
|
|
If solar time is given directly, then this option has no effect. |
164 |
|
|
.TP |
165 |
|
|
.BI -m \ mer |
166 |
|
|
The site standard meridian is |
167 |
|
|
.I mer |
168 |
|
|
degrees west of Greenwich. |
169 |
|
|
(Use negative angle for east.) |
170 |
|
|
This is used in the calculation of solar time. |
171 |
|
|
Be sure to give the correct longitude also! |
172 |
|
|
If solar time is given directly, then this option has no effect. |
173 |
greg |
1.3 |
.TP |
174 |
greg |
1.4 |
.BI -i \ time_interval [min] |
175 |
greg |
1.3 |
If gendaylit is used with weather files, the specified instantaneous points of time may be incorrect. This error occurs |
176 |
|
|
due to the fact that measurement results are frequently defined for time intervals, not for specific points of time. |
177 |
|
|
Although gendaylit is working correctly, this may lead to wrong outputs especially at low sun altitudes. |
178 |
greg |
1.4 |
The -i option allows to specify the time interval of the measurements in minutes, causing the solar position to be corrected for low sun |
179 |
|
|
altitudes. A warning message is returned if a correction has been performed. |
180 |
greg |
1.3 |
|
181 |
greg |
1.1 |
.SH EXAMPLES |
182 |
|
|
A clear non-turbid sky for a solar altitude of 60 degrees and an azimut of 0 degree might be defined by: |
183 |
|
|
.IP "" .2i |
184 |
|
|
gendaylit -ang 60 0 -P 6.3 0.12 or gendaylit -ang 60 0 -W 840 135 |
185 |
|
|
This sky description corresponds to the clear sky standard of the CIE. |
186 |
|
|
.PP |
187 |
|
|
The corresponding sky with a high turbidity is: |
188 |
|
|
.IP "" .2i |
189 |
greg |
1.3 |
gendaylit -ang 60 0 -P 3.2 0.24 or gendaylit -ang 60 0 -W 720 280 |
190 |
greg |
1.1 |
.PP |
191 |
|
|
The dark overcast sky (corresponding to the CIE overcast standard, see CIE draft standard, |
192 |
|
|
Pub. No. CIE DS 003, 1st Edition, 1994) is obtained by: |
193 |
|
|
.IP "" .2i |
194 |
greg |
1.3 |
gendaylit -ang 60 0 -P 1 0.08 |
195 |
greg |
1.1 |
.PP |
196 |
|
|
A bright overcast sky is modelled with a larger value of delta, for example: |
197 |
|
|
.IP "" .2i |
198 |
|
|
gendaylit -ang 60 0 -P 1 0.35 |
199 |
|
|
.PP |
200 |
|
|
To generate the same bright overcast sky for March 2th at 3:15pm standard time at a site |
201 |
|
|
latitude of 42 degrees, 108 degrees west longitude, and a 110 degrees standard meridian: |
202 |
|
|
.IP "" .2i |
203 |
|
|
gendaylit 3 2 15.25 -a 42 -o 108 -m 110 -P 1 0.35 |
204 |
|
|
.PP |
205 |
|
|
.SH FILES |
206 |
|
|
/usr/local/lib/ray/perezlum.cal |
207 |
|
|
.SH AUTHOR |
208 |
greg |
1.3 |
Jean-Jacques Delaunay, Jan Wienold, Wendelin Sprenger, Fraunhofer ISE (Freiburg i.B., Germany) ([email protected]) |
209 |
greg |
1.1 |
.SH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
210 |
greg |
1.3 |
The first work on this program was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Research |
211 |
greg |
1.1 |
and Technology (BMFT) under contract No. 0329294A, and a scholarship from |
212 |
|
|
the French Environment and Energy Agency (ADEME) which was co-funded by Bouygues. |
213 |
greg |
1.3 |
Many thanks to Peter Apian-Bennewitz, Arndt Berger, Christian Reetz, Ann Kovach, R. Perez, C. Gueymard and G. Ward for their help. |
214 |
greg |
1.1 |
.SH "SEE ALSO" |
215 |
|
|
gensky(1), rpict(1), rview(1), xform(1) |