ViewVC Help
View File | Revision Log | Show Annotations | Download File | Root Listing
root/radiance/ray/doc/man/man1/gendaylit.1
Revision: 1.4
Committed: Fri Aug 9 16:44:19 2013 UTC (11 years, 8 months ago) by greg
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: rad5R2, rad4R2P2, rad5R0, rad5R1, rad4R2, rad4R2P1
Changes since 1.3: +20 -15 lines
Log Message:
Bug fixes and new -E and -i options (from Wendelin Sprenger and Jan Wienold)

File Contents

# User Rev Content
1 greg 1.3 .\" RCSid "$Id: gendaylit.1,v 1.2 2009/06/06 20:22:49 greg Exp $"
2 greg 1.2 .TH GENDAYLIT 1 4/12/94 "RADIANCE ISE/ADEME EXTENSIONS"
3 greg 1.1 .SH NAME
4 greg 1.4 gendaylit - generates a RADIANCE description of the daylight sources using Perez models for direct and diffuse components
5 greg 1.1 .SH SYNOPSIS
6 greg 1.4 .B "gendaylit month day hour [-P|-W|-L|-G|-E] input_value(s) "
7 greg 1.1 [
8     .B options
9     ]
10     .br
11 greg 1.4 .B "gendaylit -ang altitude azimuth [-P|-W|-L|-G|-E] input_value(s) "
12 greg 1.1 [
13     .B options
14     ]
15     .SH DESCRIPTION
16     .I Gendaylit
17     produces a RADIANCE scene description based on an angular distribution of the
18     daylight sources (direct+diffuse) for the given atmospheric conditions
19     (direct and diffuse component of the solar radiation), date and
20 greg 1.3 local standard time. The default output is the radiance of the sun (direct) and the sky (diffuse)
21 greg 1.1 integrated over the visible spectral range (380-780 nm). We have used the
22     calculation of the sun's position and the ground brightness models which
23     were programmed in
24     .I gensky.
25    
26     The diffuse angular distribution is calculated using the Perez et al.
27     sky luminance distribution model (see Solar Energy Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 235-245, 1993) which, quoting Perez,
28     describes "the mean instantaneous sky luminance angular distribution patterns for all sky
29     conditions from overcast to clear, through partly cloudy, skies". The correctness of the
30     resulting sky radiance/luminance values in this simulation is ensured through the normalization of the modelled
31     sky diffuse to the measured sky diffuse irradiances/illuminances.
32    
33 greg 1.3 As described below, the radiation can be defined with the pairs direct-normal and diffuse-horizontal irradiance
34 greg 1.4 (-W option), direct-horizontal and diffuse-horizontal irradiance (-G option), direct-normal and diffuse-horizontal
35     illuminance (-L option) or global-horizontal irradiation alone (-E option). The direct-normal radiation
36     is understood here as the radiant flux coming from the sun and an area of approximately 3 degrees around the sun
37     (World Meteorological Organisation specifications for measuring the direct radiation.
38     The aperture angle of a pyrheliometer is approximately 6 degrees).
39 greg 1.1 To simplify the calculations for the direct radiation, the sun is represented as a disk and no
40     circumsolar radiation is modelled in the 3 degrees around the sun. This means that
41     all the measured/evaluated direct radiation is added to the 0.5 degree sun source.
42    
43 greg 1.3 The direct and diffuse solar irradiances/illuminances are the inputs needed for the calculation.
44     These quantities are the commonly accessible data from radiometric measurement centres or from the
45     Test Reference Year. The use of such data is the recommended method for achieving the most accurate
46     simulation results.
47 greg 1.1
48     The atmospheric conditions are modelled with the Perez et al. parametrization
49     (see Solar Energy Vol. 44, No 5, pp. 271-289, 1990), which is dependent on the values for
50 greg 1.3 the direct-normal and the diffuse-horizontal irradiances. The three parameters
51 greg 1.1 are epsilon, delta and the solar zenith angle. "Epsilon variations express the transition from
52     a totally overcast sky (epsilon=1) to a low turbidity clear sky (epsilon>6); delta
53     variations reflect the opacity/thickness of the clouds". Delta can vary from 0.05
54     representing a dark sky to 0.5 for a very bright sky. Not every combination of
55     epsilon, delta and solar zenith angle is possible. For a clear day, if
56     epsilon and the solar zenith angle are known, then delta can be determined. For intermediate or overcast
57     days, the sky can be dark or bright, giving a range of possible values for delta
58     when epsilon and the solar zenith are fixed. The relation between epsilon and delta
59 greg 1.3 is represented in a figure on page 393 in Solar Energy Vol.42, No 5, 1989. Note that the
60 greg 1.1 epsilon parameter is a function of the solar zenith angle. It means that a clear day
61     will not be defined by fixed values of epsilon and delta. Consequently the input
62     parameters, epsilon, delta and the solar zenith angle, have to be determined on a graph.
63     It might be easier to work with the measured direct and diffuse components (direct normal irradiance/illuminance
64     and diffuse horizontal irradiance/illuminance) than with the epsilon and delta parameters.
65    
66     The conversion of irradiance into illuminance for the direct and the diffuse
67     components is determined by the luminous efficacy models of Perez et al. (see
68     Solar Energy Vol. 44, No 5, pp. 271-289, 1990). To convert the luminance values
69     into radiance integrated over the visible range of the spectrum,
70     we devide the luminance by the white light efficacy factor of
71     179 lm/W. This is consistent with the RADIANCE calculation because the luminance
72 greg 1.3 will be recalculated from the radiance integrated over the visible range by:
73 greg 1.1
74     luminance = radiance_integrated_over_visible_range * 179 or
75     luminance = (RED*.263 + GREEN*.655 + BLUE*.082) * 179 with the capability
76     to model colour (where radiance_integrated_over_visible_range == (RED + GREEN + BLUE)/3).
77    
78     From
79 greg 1.4 .I gensky, if the hour is preceded by a plus sign ('+'), then it is interpreted as local solar time instead of standard time.
80 greg 1.3 The second form gives the solar angles explicitly. The altitude is measured in degrees above the horizon, and the
81     azimuth is measured in degrees west of South. The x axis points east, the y axis points north, and the z axis
82     corresponds to the zenith. The actual material and surface(s) used for the sky is left up to the user.
83     In addition to the specification of a sky distribution function,
84 greg 1.1 .I gendaylit
85 greg 1.3 suggests an ambient value in a comment at the beginning of the description to use with the
86 greg 1.1 .I \-av
87 greg 1.3 option of the RADIANCE rendering programs. (See rview(1) and rpict(1).) This value is the cosine-weighted
88     radiance of the sky in W/sr/m^2.
89 greg 1.1 .PP
90     .I Gendaylit
91     can be used with the following input parameters. They offer three possibilities
92 greg 1.3 to run it: with the Perez parametrization, with irradiance values and with illuminance values.
93 greg 1.1 .TP 10n
94     .BR \-P
95     .I epsilon
96     .I delta
97     (these are the Perez parameters)
98     .TP
99     .BR \-W
100     .I direct-normal-irradiance
101     (W/m^2),
102     .I diffuse-horizontal-irradiance
103     (W/m^2)
104     .TP
105 greg 1.3 .BR \-G
106     .I direct-horizontal-irradiance
107     (W/m^2),
108     .I diffuse-horizontal-irradiance
109     (W/m^2)
110     .TP
111 greg 1.1 .BR \-L
112     .I direct-normal-illuminance
113     (lm/m^2),
114     .I diffuse-horizontal-illuminance
115     (lm/m^2)
116 greg 1.4 .TP
117     .BR \-E
118     .I global-horizontal-irradiance
119     (W/m^2)
120     .PP
121     The -E option calculates the diffuse irradiance fraction with the model of Erbs, Klein and Duffie (Solar Energy 28/4, 1982),
122     being followed by the calculation of the -G option. Due to the high uncertainty of the model, the results have to be handled
123     with care. A second irradiance value, if available, is definitely recommended.
124 greg 1.1 .PP
125 greg 1.3 The output can be set to either the radiance of the visible radiation, the solar radiance (full spectrum) or the luminance.
126 greg 1.1 .TP 10n
127     .BR \-O [0|1|2]
128 greg 1.3 (0=output in W/m^2/sr visible radiation (default), 1=output in W/m^2/sr solar radiation, 2=output in lm/m^2/sr luminance).
129 greg 1.1 .PP
130     .I Gendaylit
131     supports the following options.
132     .TP 10n
133     .BR \-s
134     The source description of the sun is not generated.
135     .TP
136 greg 1.3 .BR \-w
137     Suppress warning messages
138     .TP
139 greg 1.1 .BI -g \ rfl
140     Average ground reflectance is
141     .I rfl.
142     This value is used to compute
143     .I skyfunc
144     when Dz is negative.
145     .PP
146     The following options do not apply when the solar
147     altitude and azimuth are given explicitly.
148     .TP
149     .BI -a \ lat
150     The site latitude is
151     .I lat
152     degrees north.
153     (Use negative angle for south latitude.)
154     This is used in the calculation of sun angle.
155     .TP
156     .BI -o \ lon
157     The site longitude is
158     .I lon
159     degrees west.
160     (Use negative angle for east longitude.)
161     This is used in the calculation of solar time and sun angle.
162     Be sure to give the corresponding standard meridian also!
163     If solar time is given directly, then this option has no effect.
164     .TP
165     .BI -m \ mer
166     The site standard meridian is
167     .I mer
168     degrees west of Greenwich.
169     (Use negative angle for east.)
170     This is used in the calculation of solar time.
171     Be sure to give the correct longitude also!
172     If solar time is given directly, then this option has no effect.
173 greg 1.3 .TP
174 greg 1.4 .BI -i \ time_interval [min]
175 greg 1.3 If gendaylit is used with weather files, the specified instantaneous points of time may be incorrect. This error occurs
176     due to the fact that measurement results are frequently defined for time intervals, not for specific points of time.
177     Although gendaylit is working correctly, this may lead to wrong outputs especially at low sun altitudes.
178 greg 1.4 The -i option allows to specify the time interval of the measurements in minutes, causing the solar position to be corrected for low sun
179     altitudes. A warning message is returned if a correction has been performed.
180 greg 1.3
181 greg 1.1 .SH EXAMPLES
182     A clear non-turbid sky for a solar altitude of 60 degrees and an azimut of 0 degree might be defined by:
183     .IP "" .2i
184     gendaylit -ang 60 0 -P 6.3 0.12 or gendaylit -ang 60 0 -W 840 135
185     This sky description corresponds to the clear sky standard of the CIE.
186     .PP
187     The corresponding sky with a high turbidity is:
188     .IP "" .2i
189 greg 1.3 gendaylit -ang 60 0 -P 3.2 0.24 or gendaylit -ang 60 0 -W 720 280
190 greg 1.1 .PP
191     The dark overcast sky (corresponding to the CIE overcast standard, see CIE draft standard,
192     Pub. No. CIE DS 003, 1st Edition, 1994) is obtained by:
193     .IP "" .2i
194 greg 1.3 gendaylit -ang 60 0 -P 1 0.08
195 greg 1.1 .PP
196     A bright overcast sky is modelled with a larger value of delta, for example:
197     .IP "" .2i
198     gendaylit -ang 60 0 -P 1 0.35
199     .PP
200     To generate the same bright overcast sky for March 2th at 3:15pm standard time at a site
201     latitude of 42 degrees, 108 degrees west longitude, and a 110 degrees standard meridian:
202     .IP "" .2i
203     gendaylit 3 2 15.25 -a 42 -o 108 -m 110 -P 1 0.35
204     .PP
205     .SH FILES
206     /usr/local/lib/ray/perezlum.cal
207     .SH AUTHOR
208 greg 1.3 Jean-Jacques Delaunay, Jan Wienold, Wendelin Sprenger, Fraunhofer ISE (Freiburg i.B., Germany) ([email protected])
209 greg 1.1 .SH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
210 greg 1.3 The first work on this program was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Research
211 greg 1.1 and Technology (BMFT) under contract No. 0329294A, and a scholarship from
212     the French Environment and Energy Agency (ADEME) which was co-funded by Bouygues.
213 greg 1.3 Many thanks to Peter Apian-Bennewitz, Arndt Berger, Christian Reetz, Ann Kovach, R. Perez, C. Gueymard and G. Ward for their help.
214 greg 1.1 .SH "SEE ALSO"
215     gensky(1), rpict(1), rview(1), xform(1)