[Radiance-dev] Re: Radiance in Debian
Charles Ehrlich
ckehrlich at yahoo.com
Sat Nov 3 17:04:53 PDT 2007
Adding the Radiance compatibility path, directory, and links should be the default behavior and should ask the user if he/she would like NOT to install the compatibility path add-on...only if the system currently has a "genbox" and "rview" namespace conflict. That way the default configuration includes everything needed and only with user interaction could the installation fail to produce a working installation.
-Chas
----- Original Message ----
From: Bernd Zeimetz <bernd at bzed.de>
To: code development <radiance-dev at radiance-online.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 3, 2007 3:57:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Radiance-dev] Re: Radiance in Debian
Francesco Anselmo wrote:
>> This seems an acceptable solution to me -- having a second Radiance
>> bin directory that people can include in their PATH to get
backwards-
>> compatibility. I have no problem with that. Does anyone else
object
>> before I implement the necessary changes?
>
> IMHO this is the best solution proposed so far, and perhaps the
> Debian post-install script could ask the user whether he wants to
> add the "compatibility" paths ...
No need for that, I can just drop it into the package, symlinks don't
take much space, so that's not a problem at all.
> About other wishes, it would be nice to add 3ds2mgf from the source
> package (it is in /ray/src/cv/mgflib),
I'll build that with the next upload. Seems it's not included in the
Rmakefile and I forgot about it. I think Greg could add this to the
programs which are build in that directory anyway.
> or external programmes like
> gendaylit
(http://radsite.lbl.gov/radiance/pub/generators/index.html).
If you convince the authors to put them under a free license, this is
not a problem at all. I've only looked at gendaylit, but it's license
it
not free according to the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
* Don't even think of selling this software to other people, or
* distributing it commercially, that is strict and explicit no.
Worst piece in there, didn't read the rest carefully.
Some days ago I was pointed to a lot of documentation which is shipped
with Learnix (if I remember right). It would probably be interesting to
ship that with Debian, too (if the License permits to do so). If the
Learnix people are reading here - I'd be happy if we could work
something out (if I don't get any reaction I'll find an email addy and
write directly).
An other interesting option would be to provide FAI
(http://www.informatik.uni-koeln.de/fai/) installers to install
Radiance
on clusters - if anybody has a use for this.
Also I'd like to announce the availability of Radiance in my blog -
which is on planet.debian.org - as soon as the packaging seems to be
stable enough. If anybody knows a good summary about radiance, which
I'd
be allowed to share (with proper reference of course) - please point me
to it.
Best regards,
Bernd
--
Bernd Zeimetz
<bernd at bzed.de> <http://bzed.de/>
_______________________________________________
Radiance-dev mailing list
Radiance-dev at radiance-online.org
http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://radiance-online.org/pipermail/radiance-dev/attachments/20071103/c3c860c1/attachment.html
More information about the Radiance-dev
mailing list