[HDRI] Scaling artifacts in Photoshop CS2 w/ Radiance files?
Mark Banas (lists)
listmail at mab3d.com
Fri Jun 16 23:30:18 CEST 2006
On Jun 16, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Chris Cox wrote:
> This is because of the sharpening aspect of bicubic kernels (they
> really
> don't work for HDR images), and can be made worse in the Radiance file
> format because we weren't clamping negative values correctly.
Hi Chris,
Glad you are on this list as well!
Hot on the heels of my previous post about the Radiance files from
Photoshop CS2, I've put up a page to explain the amplified artifacts
I have seen in "Merge to HDR" in CS2 (and why I stopped using it).
Perhaps you can take a look at this and tell me where I've either
gone wrong or perhaps why I'm seeing these dramatic effects. The odd
part is that I don't remember having this problem in the past, but I
know that I recently upgraded to 9.0.1 and because of this problem I
have switched to batch HDR-creation with Photomatix instead (despite
using CS2 in my workflow right *after* creating the HDRs).
Here is a page (with links to the "originals") illustrating the
problem I am seeing with "ghosts" in PS CS2 Merge to HDR:
http://www.mab3d.com/temp/ot3d/HDartifacts.html
At the same time, this is a general query to see if anyone else has
seen/ had these problems with Merge to HDR in CS2, and what they have
discovered.
-Mark
BTW, for those that are interested, the ZIP archive of stitched
exposures includes JPEGs that have the metadata from the pre-stitch
images appended to them by EXIFtool - makes HDR creation a bit
easier. Plus, if you peruse this data in a capable image browser you
can get a good idea of how I process my RAWs for HDR creation.
More information about the HDRI
mailing list